SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Akbar vs State Of Kerala on 27 May, 2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALEXANDER THOMAS

MONDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF MAY 2019 / 6TH JYAISHTA, 1941

Bail Appl..No. 3294 of 2019

CRIME NO. 122/2019 OF Changaramkulam Police Station , Malappuram

PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.23:

1 AKBAR
AGED 58 YEARS
S/O.ALAVI, RAYINMARACKAR HOUSE (URILAPRAMBIL HOUSE),
P.O POOVATHOOR, PANGU, PAVARATTY,
THRISSUR DISTRICT.

2 NOORJAHAN,
AGED 48 YEARS
W/O.AKBAR, RAYINMARACKAR HOUSE(URILAPRAMBIL HOUSE),
P.O.POOVATHOOR PANGU, PAVARATTY,
THRISSUR DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.K.I.SAGEER IBRAHIM

RESPONDENT/STATE:

STATE OF KERALA
REP.BY SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
(F.I.R.NO.122/2019)CHANGARAMKULAM POLICE
STATION,CHANGARAMKULAM,MALAPPURAM
DISTRICT.REP.THROUGH PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KERALA,ERNAKULAM-682031.

SMT.PRIYA SHANAVAS, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27.05.2019,
THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Bail Appl..No. 3294 of 2019

2

ALEXANDER THOMAS, J.

B.A.No.3294 of 2019

Dated this the 27th day of May, 2019

ORDER

The two petitioners herein are accused Nos.2 and 3 respectively in

Crime No.122/2019 of Changaramkulam Police Station, which has been

registered for offences punishable under Secs.498A, 341, 323 r/w.34 of

SectionIPC. The petitioners herein are the father and mother of the lady defacto

complainant’s husband. Accused No.1 in this case is the husband of the

lady defacto complainant.

2. The case of the prosecution in short is that, after the marriage

between the spouses, 155 sovereigns of gold ornaments and an amount of

Rs.2.5 lakhs was given to the lady and in the said wedlock two children

have been born and that the said gold ornaments having misappropriate

by the accused persons who have harassed her mentally and physically and

thereby committed the above said offences. Accused No.1 is now aborad in

connection with his employment.

3. After having heard learned counsel for the petitioners and

learned Public Prosecutor and after evaluating the facts and circumstances

of this case, this Court is of the considered view that the custodial
Bail Appl..No. 3294 of 2019

3

interrogation of the petitioners may not really be imperative and necessary.

Accordingly it is ordered in the event of the petitioners has been arrested in

the above said crime then they shall be released on bail on their separately

executing bond for Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Forty Thousand only) each and

on furnishing two solvent sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction

of the Investigating Officer concerned.

4. However, the grant of bail will be subject to the following
conditions:

(a) Petitioners shall not involve in any criminal offences of similar
nature.

(b) Petitioners shall fully co-operate with the investigation.

(c) Petitioners shall report before the Investigating Officer as and when
required in that connection.

(d) Petitioners shall not influence witness or shall not tamper or attempt
to tamper evidence in any manner, whatsoever.

If the petitioners violate all or any of the bail conditions, then the

jurisdictional court concerned will stand hereby authorised, to consider the

plea for cancellation of bail, if required, in accordance with law.

With these observations and directions, the above Bail Application

will stand disposed of.

Sd/-

ALEXANDER THOMAS
nak JUDGE

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation