SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Akhilesh Mishra vs State Of U.P. on 19 October, 2019


?Court No. – 74

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. – 43410 of 2019

Applicant :- Akhilesh Mishra

Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.

Counsel for Applicant :- Sanjeev Kumar Singh

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

Hon’ble Arvind Kumar Mishra-I,J.

Learned counsel for the applicant has filed supplementary affidavit, the same is taken on record.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State of U.P and perused the material available on record.

Upon various consideration made in the accompanying affidavit claiming innocence, it transpires that the death in question cannot be said to be dowry death in the sense as to attract ingredients of Section – 304-B SectionI.P.C. Applicant is brother-in-law of the deceased. He had no occasion ever to have indulged in committing any dowry death. The death in question itself is accidental and is very much evidenced by the attendant facts and circumstances of the case. In case, the applicant is admitted to bail, there is no possibility of his absconding or misusing the liberty of bail. The applicant has no previous criminal history and is languishing in jail since 12.9.2019.

Learned A.G.A. has opposed prayer for bail.

Without entering into merit of the case but considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of accusation and the severity of punishment in case of conviction and the nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tampering with witness or apprehension of threat to the complainant and prima facie satisfaction of the Court in support of the charge, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.

Accordingly, bail application is allowed.

Let the applicant – Akhilesh Mishra involved in Case Crime No. 182 of 2013, under Sections – 498A, 304-B SectionI.P.C. 3/4 D.P. Act, Police Station – Barwapatti, District – Kushinagar be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

Order Date :- 19.10.2019

S Rawat



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation