R/CR.MA/16764/2018 JUDGMENT
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 16764 of 2018
FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE:
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.Y. KOGJE Sd/-
1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to No
see the judgment ?
2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? No
3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the No
judgment ?
4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law No
as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India or any
order made thereunder ?
AMANULLAH SAFIMIYA THAKORE
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT
Appearance:
MR JAY M THAKKAR for MR SAMIR AFZAL KHAN(3733) for the
PETITIONER(s) No. 1
MR VB MALIK for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 2
MR KP RAVAL, APP (2) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.Y. KOGJE
Date : 07/09/2018
ORAL JUDGMENT
1. RULE. Learned APP Mr.K.P.Raval waives service
of Rule on behalf of respondent No.1-State. Learned
Advocate Mr.V.B.Malik has instructions to appear on
behalf of respondent No.2-complainant.
Page 1 of 3
R/CR.MA/16764/2018 JUDGMENT
2. This application under Section 482 of the
Criminal Procedure Code is filed for quashing of FIR
being I-CR No.72 of 2018 registered with Gorva Police
Station, Vadodara for offences under Sections 498A of the
Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 7 of the Dowry
Prohibition Act, on the ground of settlement arrived at
between the parties.
3. Learned Advocate for the applicant submitted
that the applicant and respondent No.2-complainant are
husband and wife and had married in the year 2015 and
because intervention of family members and community
leaders, all disputes amongst them are amicably settled
and in fact, they have now decided to reunite and hence,
the present petition for quashing.
4. Learned Advocate Mr.V.B.Malik for respondent
No.2-complainant submitted that respondent No.2-
Sabnambanu Amallulah Thakore is present before the Court.
He identifies the complainant. The respondent No.2-
complainant has filed affidavit ratifying the compromise
arrived at between the parties.
5. Considering the nature of allegations made in
the FIR and the compromise arrived at between the
parties, as the dispute is now amicably settled, no
useful purpose will be served in continuing the
Page 2 of 3
R/CR.MA/16764/2018 JUDGMENT
prosecution of the present applicant.
6. In view of the aforesaid, the application is
allowed. FIR being I-CR No.72 of 2018 registered with
Gorva Police Station, Vadodara is ordered to be quashed.
Rule is made absolute.
Direct service is permitted.
Sd/-
(A.Y. KOGJE, J)
SHITOLE
Page 3 of 3
