SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Amanullah Safimiya Thakore vs State Of Gujarat on 7 September, 2018

R/CR.MA/16764/2018 JUDGMENT

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 16764 of 2018

FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE:

HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.Y. KOGJE Sd/-

1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to No
see the judgment ?

2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? No

3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the No
judgment ?

4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law No
as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India or any
order made thereunder ?

AMANULLAH SAFIMIYA THAKORE
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT

Appearance:
MR JAY M THAKKAR for MR SAMIR AFZAL KHAN(3733) for the
PETITIONER(s) No. 1
MR VB MALIK for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 2
MR KP RAVAL, APP (2) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.Y. KOGJE

Date : 07/09/2018

ORAL JUDGMENT

1. RULE. Learned APP Mr.K.P.Raval waives service

of Rule on behalf of respondent No.1-State. Learned

Advocate Mr.V.B.Malik has instructions to appear on

behalf of respondent No.2-complainant.

Page 1 of 3

R/CR.MA/16764/2018 JUDGMENT

2. This application under Section 482 of the

Criminal Procedure Code is filed for quashing of FIR

being I-CR No.72 of 2018 registered with Gorva Police

Station, Vadodara for offences under Sections 498A of the

Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 7 of the Dowry

Prohibition Act, on the ground of settlement arrived at

between the parties.

3. Learned Advocate for the applicant submitted

that the applicant and respondent No.2-complainant are

husband and wife and had married in the year 2015 and

because intervention of family members and community

leaders, all disputes amongst them are amicably settled

and in fact, they have now decided to reunite and hence,

the present petition for quashing.

4. Learned Advocate Mr.V.B.Malik for respondent

No.2-complainant submitted that respondent No.2-

Sabnambanu Amallulah Thakore is present before the Court.

He identifies the complainant. The respondent No.2-

complainant has filed affidavit ratifying the compromise

arrived at between the parties.

5. Considering the nature of allegations made in

the FIR and the compromise arrived at between the

parties, as the dispute is now amicably settled, no

useful purpose will be served in continuing the

Page 2 of 3
R/CR.MA/16764/2018 JUDGMENT

prosecution of the present applicant.

6. In view of the aforesaid, the application is

allowed. FIR being I-CR No.72 of 2018 registered with

Gorva Police Station, Vadodara is ordered to be quashed.

Rule is made absolute.

Direct service is permitted.

Sd/-

(A.Y. KOGJE, J)
SHITOLE

Page 3 of 3

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2020 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation