SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Amarjit vs State Of Punjab And Anr on 21 August, 2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

Criminal Misc. No.M-52959 of 2018
Date of Decision: 21.08.2019

Amarjit
…Petitioner(s)
Versus
State of Punjab another
…Respondent(s)
Criminal Misc. No.M-46601 of 2018

Raj Kumari another
…Petitioner(s)
Versus
State of Punjab another
…Respondent(s)

Criminal Misc. No.M-47738 of 2018

Joginder Kaur @ Gindo another
…Petitioner(s)
Versus
State of Punjab another
…Respondent(s)

Criminal Misc. No.M-50821 of 2018

Shiv Nandan @ Sabi
…Petitioner(s)
Versus
State of Punjab another
…Respondent(s)

1 of 3
26-08-2019 07:21:02 :::
Criminal Misc. No. M-47738 of 2018 -2-

CORAM:- HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HARI PAL VERMA

Present:- Mr. S.P. Soi, Advoate
for the petitioner(s).

Mr. Saurav Khurana, DAG, Punjab.
*****

HARI PAL VERMA, J. (Oral)

This order shall dispose four cases i.e. Criminal Misc. Nos.M-

46601, 47738, 50821 and 52959 of 2018, as similar prayer has been made

in all the petitions seeking quashing of common FIR i.e. FIR No.29 dated

4.2.2018 under Section 498A IPC and Sections 420, Section375/Section4/Section120-B IPC

(added later on) registered at PS Adampur, District Jalandhar. However,

for brevity, facts have been noticed from Criminal Misc. No.M-52959 of

2018.

Learned counsel for the petitioners states that after filing these

petitions, seeking quashing of the FIR, on merits, a compromise has arrived

at between the parties and consequently, a separate petition i.e. CRM-M-

15329-2019 Dev Raj ors. Vs. State of Punjab anr., seeking quashing

of FIR in question, on the basis of compromise, has been filed, which is

now listed for hearing on 04.12.2019. He further states that the petitioner-

husband had also filed a petition under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage

Act, wherein the complainant-wife has not contested the said petition and

resultantly, a decree of restitution of conjugal rights has been passed

against the complainant-wife on 19.05.2014.

In the background of the submissions made above, learned

counsel for the petitioners states that at this stage, he seeks withdrawal of

2 of 3
26-08-2019 07:21:03 :::
Criminal Misc. No. M-47738 of 2018 -3-

these petitions, as a separate petition for quashing of FIR on the basis of

compromise is already pending consideration.

Dismissed as withdrawn.

Photocopy of this order be attached in the file of each

connected case.

August 21, 2019 ( HARI PAL VERMA )
AK JUDGE

Whether speaking / reasoned? Yes / No
Whether reportable? Yes / No

3 of 3
26-08-2019 07:21:03 :::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2020 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation