SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Amit Das @ Khoka vs Unknown on 16 July, 2021

Try out our Premium Member services: Virtual Legal Assistant, Query Alert Service and an ad-free experience. Free for one month and pay only if you like it.

16.07.2021 CRM 2589 of 2021
(Via Video Conference)
Court No.28
Item No.23

(Rejected) In Re:- An application for bail under section 439 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure filed in connection with Chanditala Police
Akd Station Case No. 198 of 2020, dated 11.08.2020 under
302/34 of the Indian Penal Code;


In the matter of : Amit Das @ Khoka

Mr. Navnil Dey,
Mr. Rajeshwar Chakraborty.

…For the Petitioner
Mr. S. G. Mukherjee, Ld. P.P.,
Ms. Faria Hossain,
Mr. Aniket Mitra.

… For the State.

The Advocate on Record of the petitioner undertakes to affirm
and stamp the petition/application as per the Rules within four
weeks from date. Subject to such undertaking the application is
taken up for hearing.

The petitioner has filed the instant application for bail under
Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure after being arrested in
connection with Chanditala Police Station Case No. 198 of 2020
Sections 498A/302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The petitioner is the husband of the victim lady, who died of
strangulation. Learned Advocate for the petitioner prays for bail on
the ground of parity. It is submitted that the father of the present
petitioner has already been enlarged on bail and, therefore, there is
no necessity of keeping the petitioner in custody, who is languishing
in jail since last 339 days.

Learned Advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail. It is
submitted that the complicity of the petitioner cannot be ruled out
from the statement of the son of the victim lady recorded under
Section 161 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Though the charge
sheet has been submitted but the case has not been committed for


After perusing the statement of the minor boy recorded under
Section 161 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and the role of the
petitioner attributable to the commission of offence, we do not think
that it is a fit case where the petitioner should be enlarged on bail.

Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected.
The application for bail, being CRM 2589 of 2021, is

(Harish Tandon, J)

(Subhasis Dasgupta, J.)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link
MyNation Times Magzine

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.


Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation