SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Amit Singh @ Amit Naydu S/O Shri … vs State Of Rajasthan on 29 January, 2019

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 652/2019

1. Amit Singh @ Amit Naydu S/o Shri Harikishan Naydu,
Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village Niwaru, Brahmano Ka
Mohalla, Back Side To Raghunathji Maharaj Temple,
Panchayat Samiti Jhotwara, Police Station Kardhani,
Jaipur.
2. Smt. Anju Kanwar W/o Shri Govind Singh Bhati, D/o
Chand Singh Sisodiya B/c Rajput, Aged About 51 Years,
R/o Village Niwaru, Brahmano Ka Mohalla, Back Side To
Raghunathji Maharaj Temple, Panchayat Samiti Jhotwara,
Police Station Kardhani, Jaipur.
—-Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp.
2. Smt. Anjali Rawat W/o Shri Amit Singh @ Amit Naydu,
D/o Shri Rajendra Singh Rawat B/c Rajput, Aged About
23 Years, R/o Plot No.12-A, Shriram Vihar Colony, Karni
Palace Road, Panchayawala, Jaipur, Police Station Karni
Vihar, Jaipur.
—-Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gajendra Singh Rathore
For Respondent(s) : Mr. VS Godara PP
Mr. D.N. Sharma for respondent no.2

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA

-/Order/-

29/01/2019

The present petition has been filed under Section 482

Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of proceedings arising out of FIR

No.42/2015 registered at Police Station Mahila Thana, Jaipur City

(West) for the offences under Sections 498A, 406, 323, 506, 509

and 120B IPC.

(2 of 3) [CRLMP-652/2019]

In the present case, quashing of FIR has been sought

on the basis of compromise.

Smt. Anjali Rawat, respondent no.2 is present in the

court. She has been identified by her counsel Mr. D.N. Sharma. Mr.

Amit Singh @ Amit Naydu petitioner no.1 is also present in the

court and he has been identified by his counsel Mr. Gajendra Singh

Rathore.

Smt. Anjali Rawat, respondent no.2 has stated that on

24.2.2014 she was married with petitioner no.1 as per Hindu

customs and rites. It is submitted that due to difference of

opinion, she was compelled to lodge the impugned FIR.

Learned counsel for the respondent no.2 has submitted

that due to intervention of respectables, elders of the family and

common relations, the matrimonial dispute has been amicably

resolved.

Smt. Anjali Rawat, respondent no.2 has stated that the

petitioner no.1 Amti Singh @ Amit Naydu has agreed to pay

Rs.80,000/- towards Stridhan, expenses on marriage, permanent

alimony and cost of litigation etc.

Learned counsel for the parties have submitted the trial

court vide order dated 21.12.2018 accepted the compromise

presented qua offence under Section 406 IPC as the said offence

is compoundable but rejected the same qua offence under Section

498A IPC on the ground that the said offence is non-

compoundable.

Smt. Anjali Rawat, respondent no.2 has submitted that

the Demand Draft amounting to Rs.80,000/-, agreed to be paid by

petitioners has been retained by Mediation and Conciliation Center

of this Court. She further stated that divorce petition under
(3 of 3) [CRLMP-652/2019]

Section 13B of Hindu Marriage Act for dissolution of marriage by

way of mutual consent is pending before the Family Court No.1,

Jaipur. It is submitted that the divorce petition under Section 13B

of Hindu Marriage Act is coming for final motion on 13.7.2019.

Smt. Anjali Rawat, complainant/respondent no.2 has

prayed that the impugned FIR be quashed as she no longer

intends to pursue the same.

The learned counsel for the parties have jointly relied

upon B.S. Joshi Ors. vs. State of Haryana Anr., 2003

Cri.L.J. 2028, to contend that this Court while exercising

jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. in furtherance of interest of

justice in matrimonial dispute may bring families at peace by

quashing FIR.

On the prayer made by the learned counsel for the

parties, in view of the judgment in the case of B.S. Joshi (supra),

relied by the parties, the present petition is accepted and

impugned FIR along with all its subsequent proceedings is

quashed.

(KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA)J.

Mak/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation