SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Amit vs State Of Haryana on 9 April, 2019

214.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH

I. CRM-M-10365-2019
Date of decision:09.04.2019.

AMIT … Petitioner

versus

STATE OF HARYANA ORS. …. Respondents

II. CRM-M-11700-2019

BALA … Petitioner

versus

STATE OF HARYANA …. Respondent

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HARI PAL VERMA
—-

Present: Mr. S.K. Verma, Advocate,
for the petitioner (s).

Ms. Mahima Yashpal, AAG, Haryana.

Mr. Ajay Vijarania, Advocate,
for respondents No.2 and 3.

—-

HARI PAL VERMA, J.(Oral)

This order shall dispose of two petitions i.e. CRM-M-10365-

2019 titled as Amit Versus State of Haryana and others and CRM-M-

11700-2019 titled as Bala Versus State of Haryana.

Prayer in both these petitions filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is

for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner (s) in case FIR No.0678 dated

15.10.2018 registered under Sections 323, 406, 498A, 506 and 34 of IPC at

Police Station Sadar Dadri, District Charkhi Dadri.

1 of 2
14-04-2019 18:59:40 :::
CRM-M-10365-2019 -2-

Vakalatnama filed on behalf of respondents No.2 and 3 in

CRM-M-10365-2019 in Court today, is taken on record.

Vide order dated 07.03.2019, while issuing notice of motion for

today in CRM-M-10365-2019, arrest of the petitioner (Amit) was stayed,

whereas arrest of the co-accused Bala was stayed by this Court in CRM-M-

11700-2019 vide order dated 14.03.2019.

Counsel for the petitioner(s) has argued that during pendency of

present petitions, the matter has been compromised between the parties.

However, this fact has not been disputed by the counsel

appearing on behalf of complainant (respondents No.2 and 3).

In view of the fact that the matter has been compromised

between the parties, the present petitions are rendered infructuous and

disposed of as such.

However, in case the police finds that the petitioners are

required in the case, a prior 7 days notice shall be given to them before

initiating any action against them.

(HARI PAL VERMA)
JUDGE
09.04.2019
sanjeev
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No.

Whether Reportable: Yes/No.

2 of 2
14-04-2019 18:59:40 :::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2019 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

Web Design BangladeshWeb Design BangladeshMymensingh