SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Anagha Hitesh Arya vs The State Of Maharashtra on 14 December, 2018

Sherla V.

revn.57.2018_906…doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.57 OF 2018
WITH
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.435 OF 2018
IN
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.57 OF 2018

Anagha Hitesh Arya … Applicant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra … Respondent

Mr.A.P. Mundargi, Sr. Adv. I/b K.S. Patil for the Applicant
Ms.Rekha Shinde I/b Legal Chartered for Intervener in
APPR/435/2018
Mr.Yogesh Dabke, APP, for the Respondent – State

CORAM: Mrs.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.
JUDGMENT RESERVED ON: DECEMBER 7, 2018
JUDGEMENT DELIVERED ON: DECEMBER 14, 2018

JUDGMENT:

1. This Revision application is moved by the applicant/accused

against the judgment and order dated 12.12.2017 below exhibit 4

in Sessions Case No.179 of 2016 passed by the learned Additional

Sessions Judge, Thane rejecting the discharge application. The

applicant/accused is the wife of the deceased/husband, who is

facing prosecution u/s 306 of the Indian Penal Code.

Page 1 of 17

::: Uploaded on – 14/12/2018 27/12/2018 07:21:10 :::

revn.57.2018_906…doc

2. The case of the prosecution in brief is that the

applicant/accused and her husband Hitesh got married in

December, 2002. In 2005, the applicant/wife delivered a boy and

they all were residing together at Thane. The deceased Hitesh was

working in ICICI bank. The couple was not sailing smooth due to

the disputes between them. Both of them were suspicious about

each other. The deceased Hitesh used to inform about the torture

and harassment at the hands of the applicant/accused. He had

informed his father that he was tired of his life because of the

ill-treatment. On 3.7.2015, Hitesh showed vulgar messages sent

by the applicant/accused to his friend Bhaskar and due to this

objectionable communication between the applicant/accused and

his friend, the deceased Hitesh was hurt and disturbed. On

8.7.2015, the applicant/accused called the father of the

deceased/husband. Accordingly, he went to Platinum hospital,

Thane. At that time, she told him that her husband has set himself

on fire. The father of the deceased found him in a burnt condition.

He was shifted to National Burns Centre, Navi Mumbai. However,

he succumbed to the injuries at 10.30pm on the same day. The

father thereafter on the next day, approached Kasarwadavli police

at Thane and gave complaint against the applicant/accused. The

Page 2 of 17

::: Uploaded on – 14/12/2018 27/12/2018 07:21:10 :::
revn.57.2018_906…doc

police after recording an FIR lodged by Mahendra Bhikubhai Arya,

registered the offence at C.R. No.I-165 of 2015 under section 306

of the Indian Penal Code against the applicant/accused. The case

was then committed against her. During the pendency of the

case, an application was moved for discharge at exhibit 4. The

learned Additional Sessions Judge II, Thane, by his order dated

12.12.2017 rejected the said application. Hence, this revision

application.

3. Mr.Mundargi, the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the

applicant/accused, has submitted that the material placed before

the Court does not make out the offence of abetment to commit

suicide punishable under section 306 of the Indian Penal Code. He

has submitted that the husband and wife both were suspicious

about each other. The FIR does not disclose the act of abetment

by the applicant/accused. He relied on the statement of the

witnesses, neighbours Prasad and Priya, who had reported about

the quarrel between the deceased and the accused on the night

intervening 7.7.205 and 8.7.2015 and thereafter, they were the first

to whom the applicant/accused reported the incident of burning

which took place in the morning at 8.10am on 8.7.2015. He relied

Page 3 of 17

::: Uploaded on – 14/12/2018 27/12/2018 07:21:10 :::
revn.57.2018_906…doc

on the statements of friend Bhaskar, neighbour Sharwari; so also

on the statement of one Pooja, the friend of Hitesh. He argued

that these statements do not reveal any act of abetment of the

applicant/accused wife or any role played by her in the commission

of offence of abetment to commit suicide. He relied on the

statement of Krishiv Hitesh Arya, the son of the couple which was

recorded on 16.7.2015. The learned Counsel has further

submitted that she is blamed by the father for getting involved in

the phone sex by sending messages with Bhaskar and her another

friend at Dubai. The learned Counsel has submitted that this fact of

phone sex cannot be denied. However, this cannot be said as

abetment to commit suicide as the act was done secretly with a

view to keep the deceased husband in dark. The learned Counsel

submitted that mens rea is required to prosecute a person under

section 306 of the Indian Penal Code which is absent in the

present case. The learned Counsel placed reliance on the ratio

laid down in the case of S.S. Chheena vs. Vijay Kumar

Mahajan1.

4. Learned Prosecutor while opposing this application has

submitted that the evidence before the trial Court is sufficient to

1 (2010) 12 SCC 190

Page 4 of 17

::: Uploaded on – 14/12/2018 27/12/2018 07:21:10 :::
revn.57.2018_906…doc

frame charge and the arguments of the learned Senior Counsel

can be considered at the stage of trial. It is not correct to consider

the statements of the witnesses and the truthfulness in it at the

stage of discharge. In support of his submissions, he relied on

Amit Kapoor vs. Ramesh Chander2.

5. The learned Counsel for the intervener, the complainant, has

heavily relied on the messages sent by the applicant/accused and

her friend and Bhaskar. She has submitted that the

applicant/accused has tortured her husband throughout. The

complainant has given details about the ill-treatment given by her

during their married life. The deceased husband was shocked to

come across such messages sent by his wife and received by her.

This led him to commit suicide. In support of her submission she

relied on the judgment in the case of Siddaling vs. The State,

through Kalagi police station3.

6. Heard. While deciding an application for discharge, the

Court can neither go into probable defence taken by the accused

nor the documents produced by him. Also, the Court cannot think

of a possibility of conviction of the accused. The Court while

2 (2012) 9 SCC 460
3 Criminal Appeal No.(s). 1606 of 2009 (Supreme Court) dated 9.8.2018

Page 5 of 17

::: Uploaded on – 14/12/2018 27/12/2018 07:21:10 :::
revn.57.2018_906…doc

entertaining the application for discharge under Article 227 has to

confine itself to the papers or documents produced and relied on

by the prosecution. After going through the record of the

prosecution, the Court has to find out whether charge can be

framed under the offence for which the accused is prosecuted.

This is a settled principle of law.

7. Further, it is useful to refer to the ratio laid down in the

judgment in the case of Amit Kapoor vs. Ramesh Chander

(supra) and S.S. Chhenna vs. Vijay Kumar Mahajan anr.

(supra) and Siddaling vs. The State (supra) to decide this

application.

8. In the case of S.S. Chhenna vs. Vijay Kumar Mahajan

anr. (supra), the Supreme Court while dealing with the issue of

abetment of suicide, has observed as follows:

“25. Abetment involves a mental process of instigating
a person or intentionally aiding a person in doing of a
thing. Without a positive act on the part of the
accused to instigate or aid in committing suicide,
conviction cannot be sustained. The intention of the
legislature and the ratio of the cases decided by this
Court is clear that in order to convict a person under
Section 306 Indian Penal Code there has to be a clear
mens rea to commit the offence. It also requires an
active act or direct act which led the deceased to

Page 6 of 17

::: Uploaded on – 14/12/2018 27/12/2018 07:21:10 :::
revn.57.2018_906…doc

commit suicide seeing no option and that act must
have been intended to push the deceased into such a
position that he committed suicide.”

9. In the case of Amit Kapoor vs. Ramesh Chander (supra),

the property of the deceased lady was grabbed. Her signatures

were taken on a blank paper. Money was not given to her and the

deceased lady in the said case before committing suicide had left

a suicide note that though she fully trusted the accused, he has

betrayed her. She went in depression. She gave details about the

transactions between the accused and her and held him

responsible, who drove her to the decision of committing suicide.

In the present case, there is no suicide note. So also, the facts are

different. However, the ratio laid down by the Supreme Court of

applying yardstick while deciding the matter under section 227 is

useful, which is as follows:

“19. … The standard of test and judgment which is to
be finally applied before recording a finding regarding the
guilt or otherwise of the accused is not exactly to be applied
at the stage of deciding the matter under Section 227 or
Section 228 of the Code. At that stage the court is not to
see whether there is sufficient ground for conviction of the
accused or whether the trial is sure to end in his conviction.
……”

Page 7 of 17

::: Uploaded on – 14/12/2018 27/12/2018 07:21:10 :::

revn.57.2018_906…doc

10. In the case of Siddaling vs. The State through Kalagi

police station (supra), the wife had committed suicide within four

months of marriage by jumping into a well. She committed suicide

due to the demand of dowry, cruelty and so also due to adulterous

behaviour of her husband. In the said case, the couple was

married on 6.5.2002 and thereafter, when she realised that her

husband was having illicit relationship with another lady, the matter

was taken before the Panchayat, where he had admitted that he

was living with another woman and his deceased/wife had

knowledge. He agreed that he will sever his relations, however, he

did not. The demand of dowry and ill-treatment continued and

ultimately, she committed suicide. The appeal was against the

conviction. The Supreme Court has observed that it cannot be

said that the appellant’s act of having illicit relationship with

another woman would not have affected to negate the ingredients

of section 306 of the Indian Penal Code.

11. In order to attract section 306 of the Indian Penal Code i.e.,

the abetment to commit suicide, it is necessary that the act of

abetment as contemplated under section 107 of Indian Penal Code

is to be complied with. The meaning of ‘abetment’ under the Indian

Page 8 of 17

::: Uploaded on – 14/12/2018 27/12/2018 07:21:10 :::
revn.57.2018_906…doc

Penal Code is to be strictly read as per the section and then only

can be attracted. Section 107 states as follows:

“107. Abetment of a thing.–A person abets the doing of
a thing, who–

First — Instigates any person to do that thing; or

Secondly –Engages with one or more other person or
persons in any conspiracy for the doing of that thing, if
an act or illegal omission takes place in pursuance of
that conspiracy, and in order to the doing of that thing; or

Thirdly — Intentionally aids, by any act or illegal
omission, the doing of that thing.

Explanation 1.–A person who, by willful
misrepresentation, or by willful concealment of a
material fact which he is bound to disclose, voluntarily
causes or procures, or attempts to cause or procure, a
thing to be done, is said to instigate the doing of that
thing.

Illustration A, a public officer, is authorized by a warrant
from a Court of Justice to apprehend Z. B, knowing that
fact and also that C is not Z, willfully represents to A that
C is Z, and thereby intentionally causes A to apprehend
C. Here B abets by instigation the apprehension of C.

Explanation 2.–Whoever, either prior to or at the time of
the commission of an act, does anything in order to
facilitate the commission of that act, and thereby
facilitate the commission thereof, is said to aid the doing
of that act”.

12. Thus, there should be instigation, aid, or intentional omission

to a particular act or there should be such an act of the accused,

Page 9 of 17

::: Uploaded on – 14/12/2018 27/12/2018 07:21:10 :::
revn.57.2018_906…doc

driving the deceased to the decision of committing suicide. Hence,

the facts of the present case are to be looked into on the basis of

the FIR and the statements of the witnesses. In the FIR, the

allegations are made by the father of the deceased that the

applicant/accused Anagha was used to ill-treat him and harass

him. She used to nag him on account of his earlier friendship with

one lady. She had assaulted him on account of his ex-relationship.

However, the deceased son had come across the communication

in the form of messages his friend Bhaskar, wife Anagha and her

another friend at Dubai. After coming across such objectionable

communication, Hitesh was terribly disturbed and he informed his

father that he might commit suicide because of the improper

behaviour and conduct of his wife. The statement of the mother of

the deceased supports the FIR. Apart from this FIR and the

allegations made therein, the prosecution has produced printouts

of the messages sent on the cellphone of the applicant/accused

Anagha and her friend Bhaskar and other friend. These messages

are in English and state about sexual activities, which is called and

known as Phone Sex. The language used is very vulgar.

Page 10 of 17

::: Uploaded on – 14/12/2018 27/12/2018 07:21:10 :::

revn.57.2018_906…doc

13. There is a third set of evidence i.e., the statements of the

neighbours, Deshpande couple and other person. They give a

different picture that the applicant/accused and the deceased used

to fight on different grounds and on that day, the husband was

aware of the objectionable chat which took place between the

accused and her friends. However, on the day of the incident,

when the deceased set himself on fire on 8 th July, 2015 in the

morning at 8.10 am. However, earlier to that night at 1.30am, the

deceased was drunk and there was a fight between them. The

accused went to the Police Station alongwith one neighbour

Deshpande. She had approached Deshpande and went to the

police station alongwith Mr.Deshpande. The deceased also

followed them and thereafter, in the morning again, there was fight

and the accused set himself on fire and died due to that fire. The

statements reveal that the accused person called for help by going

to her neighbours that her husband set himself on fire. She tried to

extinguish the fire. She took him to the hospital.

14. In his statement, son Krishiv has stated that the father and

mother used to fight and the mother used to object whenever his

father used to drink and they used to fight. He has also stated that

Page 11 of 17

::: Uploaded on – 14/12/2018 27/12/2018 07:21:10 :::
revn.57.2018_906…doc

the father used to assault his mother and on the night of 7.7.2015,

he saw his father was banging his mother’s head on the wall. He

also stated that he went to the Police Station alongwith his

neighbour on that night.

15. I have considered this material on record which is in the

nature of statements and messages. The statements of the father,

mother of the deceased reveal that the deceased was subjected to

ill-treatment and nagging and he was shocked and deeply hurt

after coming across the objectionable communication between his

wife and the friend. Thus, there is evidence of harassment and

nagging. However, it cannot be said that this is an abetment to

commit suicide. A cruel behaviour with specific incidents is so

grave that it leaves no option but to commit suicide, can be said an

abetment in certain cases.

16. A bunch of messages produced on record disclosing phone

sex are very vulgar. The revelation of this phone sex to the

deceased took place as per the evidence on 3.7.2015 and he

committed suicide on 8.7.2015 morning.

Page 12 of 17

::: Uploaded on – 14/12/2018 27/12/2018 07:21:10 :::

revn.57.2018_906…doc

17. The learned Senior Counsel Mr.Mundargi has made out a

point that this communication was secretly done. It is true that this

fact is crucial and has direct bearing on deciding whether this Act

can be called as an abetment. Undoubtedly, this communication

was clandestinely done with a view that it should not be known to

the deceased. This was very private and in a way immoral

behaviour of the accused. Such phone sex or chatting is not an

adultery falling under the definition of adultery under section 13(1)

of Hindu Marriage Act, which expressly states that adultery means

having voluntary sexual intercourse with person other than spouse.

Thus, when the Indian Penal Code or Hindu Marriage Act were

enacted in those days, such kind of sexual intercourse by SMSs

was never imagined by the law makers. It is not an adultery but

these are instances of infidelity and unfaithfulness, which is not

expected when the marriage is solemnised. Such acts of infidelity

are bound to cause emotional trauma to the spouse, who may

react by taking extreme step like suicide. Thus, in the

circumstances like a case in hand, the spouse who indulges into

such activity is responsible for reaction of the other spouse.

Page 13 of 17

::: Uploaded on – 14/12/2018 27/12/2018 07:21:10 :::

revn.57.2018_906…doc

18. Thus, when one partner does such activity clandestinely,

then it pre-supposes guilty mind. However, such an act or guilty

mind cannot be substituted for mens rea which is the requirement

for abetment under section 107 of the Indian Penal Code. The

intention of the partner who is engaged into such phone sex or

causing ill-treatment should be, that the other spouse should finish

his or her life. For example, if at all, the applicant/accused would

have indulged into phone sex deliberately disclosing this

repeatedly to the deceased albeit warning given by the deceased

of discontinuing such activity, it would have been considered a

planned harassment to the deceased and therefore, such

repeated, deliberate sexual SMSs would have manifested the

intention to drive the victim to the decision of committing suicide.

The guilty mind is to be necessarily linked with infidelity but not

abetment to commit suicide. It is not the case of the prosecution

in the present case. No such material is produced on record in the

present case. To commit suicide is a very unfortunate reaction of

the accused, who was deeply hurt. It was beyond his capacity to

bear such behaviour of his wife. However, this also cannot be said

that the applicant abetted the deceased to commit suicide. The

case of suicide is a very delicate issue which involves

Page 14 of 17

::: Uploaded on – 14/12/2018 27/12/2018 07:21:10 :::
revn.57.2018_906…doc

understanding and mental condition and fall out of behavioural

pattern of human being. The life is never throughout a bed of

roses but there are difficulties, fights, failures what is called as

wear and tear of life. Every individual reacts differently to the

situation depending on his or her mindset. Some persons are

strong and some are weak. Thus, the impact of reaction to a

particular incident is always different from person to person and,

therefore, the law-makers of Indian Penal Code who drafted

section 306 have linked it with section 107 by using the word

“abetment”.

19. There is evidence that on the earlier night, the deceased was

drinking at 1.30am and the incident took place at 8.10am. The

submission of the learned Counsel for the Intervener/Complainant

that the deceased was having everything and he had no reason to

commit suicide is true. The deceased was a family man having

wife, a son and parents and was getting a handsome salary while

working with ICICI bank. However, it appears that though all these

things were with him, the deceased and the accused could not

lead happy life because he could not bear the trauma of the

behaviour of his wife which led to the tragic end of his life. Thus,

Page 15 of 17

::: Uploaded on – 14/12/2018 27/12/2018 07:21:10 :::
revn.57.2018_906…doc

though the applicant/accused can be said to be responsible for the

trauma caused to the deceased, she is not an abettor for the act of

suicide.

20. In the case of Rahul Raj Singh vs. The State of

Maharashtra4 it is observed by me as follows:

“Every suicide has cause but all the causes cannot be labelled

as abetment. Therefore, while assessing abetment, the Judge

has to take the objective view guided by section 107 of the

Indian Penal Code. The harassment or torture should be of

such a degree that it really left no option and drove a person

to commit suicide. An individual may carry suicidal traits, or

may be very emotional or may be very egoist or be jealous or

vindictive. Such emotions may overpower the individual

leading him to take drastic step to kill himself or herself.

Under such circumstances, unless the mens rea is brought on

record, prima facie it cannot be said that it is an abetment.”

21. Under such circumstances, I am of the view that the order of

the learned Sessions Judge needs to be set aside as there is no

4 Anticipatory Bail Application No.661 of 2016 decided on 25.4.2016

Page 16 of 17

::: Uploaded on – 14/12/2018 27/12/2018 07:21:10 :::
revn.57.2018_906…doc

material to frame charge against the applicant/accused under

section 306 of the Indian Penal Code. Accordingly, the impugned

order dated 12.12.2017 below exhibit 4 in Sessions Case No.179

of 2016 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Thane

is quashed and set aside.

22. Revision application is allowed accordingly.

23. Criminal application No.435 of 2018 stands disposed of.

(MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.)

Page 17 of 17

::: Uploaded on – 14/12/2018 27/12/2018 07:21:10 :::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2020 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation