SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Anan vs State Of Kerala on 18 March, 2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALEXANDER THOMAS

MONDAY ,THE 18TH DAY OF MARCH 2019 / 27TH PHALGUNA, 1940

Bail Appl..No. 1780 of 2019

CRIME NO. 1231/2018 OF Malayinkeezh Police Station ,
Thiruvananthapuram

PETITIONER/S:

1 ANAN, AGED 37 YEARS
S/O.RAPHEAL, KATTUMATHU HOUSE,
KUTTANALLUR P.O., THRISSUR-680014.

2 RAPHEAL,
KATTUMATHU HOUSE, KUTTANALLUR P.O.,
THRISSUR-680014.

3 KUMARI,
KATTUMATHU HOUSE, KUTTANALLUR P.O.,
THRISSUR-680014.

BY ADV. M.PREMCHAND

RESPONDENT/S:
STATE OF KERALA,
REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT
OF KERALA.

OTHER PRESENT:
SRI.AMJAD ALI, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
18.03.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE
FOLLOWING:
::2::

Bail Appl..No. 1780 of 2019

ALEXANDER THOMAS, J.
—————————–
B.A.No.1780 Of 2019
———————————
Dated this the 18th day of March, 2019.

ORDER

The petitioners are the 3 accused in Crime No.1231/2018 of

Malayankeezhu Police Station, Thiruvananthapuram, which has

been registered for offence punishable under Sec.498A r/w Sec.34

of the I.P.C. The petitioners are husband, father-in-law and

mother-in-law of the defacto complainant. The allegation of the

defacto complainant is that after her marriage, the petitioners have

treated her with cruelty and harassment and has demanded more

dowry and caused hurt to her.

3. Taking note of the facts and circumstances disclosed in

this case, more particularly, the nature of the allegations raised in

this case, this Court is inclined to consider the plea for anticipatory

bail. Accordingly, it is ordered that in the event of the petitioners

being arrested by the Police in connection with Crime No.1231/2018

of Malayankeezhu Police Station, they shall be released on bail on

their executing a bond for Rs.40,000/- (Rupees Fourty Thousand

only) each and on furnishing two solvent sureties for the like sum

each to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer concerned.

::3::

Bail Appl..No. 1780 of 2019

4. Further it is also ordered that it will be subject to

following conditions:-

(i) The petitioners shall not involve in any criminal
offences of similar nature.

(ii) The petitioners shall fully co-operate with the
investigation.

(iii) The petitioners shall report before the Investigating
Officer as and when required in that connection.

(iv) The petitioners shall not influence witness or shall
not tamper or attempt to tamper evidence in any
manner, whatsoever.

(v) The petitioners shall not go anywhere near to the
residence of the defacto complainant.

If there is any violation of the abovesaid conditions by the

petitioners, then the jurisdictional court concerned stand hereby

empowered, to consider the plea for cancellation of bail at the

appropriate time.

With these observations and directions, the above Bail

Application stands allowed.

Sd/-

ALEXANDER THOMAS,
Judge.

bkn/-

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2019 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

Web Design BangladeshWeb Design BangladeshMymensingh