SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

And Sections 3/4 Of The Dowry … vs In Re: Gour Sundar Jana @ Goutam & … on 28 November, 2019

1

28.11.19

Sl. No.10
akd
[ALLOWED]
C. R. M. 9896 of 2019

In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure filed on 01.10.2019 in connection with Ultadanga Women Police Station Case
No. 09 dated 31.08.2019 under Sections 498A/Section406/Section313/Section506/Section34 of the Indian Penal Code
and Sections 3/Section4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

And

In Re: Gour Sundar Jana @ Goutam Ors.

… … Petitioners

Mr. Prasun Kumar Datta .. Advocate
Mr. Santanu Deb Roy .. Advocate
Mr. P. Maity .. Advocate
… … for the petitioners

Mr. Amarnath Agarwal .. Advocate
Mr. S. S. Ray .. Advocate
… … for the de-facto complainant

Mr. Binay Panda .. Advocate
Mr. Subham Bhakat .. Advocate
… … for the State

Pursuant to our earlier direction, Investigating Officer is personally present

before this court. His presence is noted and dispensed with.

Report is placed on record wherefrom it appears that some of the stridhan

articles have been recovered. Steps are being taken for recovery of the remaining articles.

Having considered the materials on record and bearing in mind the aforesaid

development in investigation, we are of the opinion that custodial interrogation of the

accused/petitioners may not be necessary in the facts of the present case and they may

be granted anticipatory bail.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the accused/petitioners namely

(1) Gour Sundar Jana @ Goutam, (2) Sutapa Jana, (3) Chinmoy Jana, (4) Swapan
2

Maity, (5) Krishna (Phuta) Maity, (6) Somen Maity (7) Tuk Tuki Mondal, be released

on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) each, with two

sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject

to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure,

1973 and on further condition that they shall appear before the court below and pray for

regular bail within four weeks from date.

The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, disposed of.

(Suvra Ghosh, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation