SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Angrej Singh vs State on 26 April, 2017

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail No. 3529 / 2017
Angrej Singh S/o Guljar Singh,, By Caste Jat Sikh R/o Ganpati
Vihar 1st, Ward No. 01 Raisingh Nagar, District Sri Ganganagar
(Raj.) (Presently Lodged in Central Jail Sri Ganganagar)

—-Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan

—-Respondent
__
For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Rajendra Charan.
For Respondent(s) : Mr.A.S.Rathore, P.P. with
Mr.Anand Prakash, Investigating Officer.
For Complainant(s): Mr.Umesh Shrimali.
__
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA
Judgment / Order
26/04/2017

The present bail application has been filed under Section 439

Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner, who is in custody in relation to

F.I.R. No.43/2017, P.S. Raisinghnagar, District Sriganganagar, for

the offences under Sections 498A, 302, 304B IPC.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public

Prosecutor assisted by the Investigating Officer and learned

counsel for the complainant. Perused the material available on

record.

The petitioner is the father-in-law of the deceased. It is

admitted position on record that after submission of the F.I.R. and

before filing of charge-sheet, the petitioner has returned a sum of

Rs.10 lacs to the first informant complainant by way of a cheque
(2 of 2)
[CRLMB-3529/2017]

issued in his favour. The amount of Rs.10 lacs has already been

appropriated in the account of the complainant. Thus, apparently,

the case of the present petitioner is distinguishable from that of

the other co-accused persons.

In view of above and having regard to the entirety of facts

and circumstances as available on record and upon a consideration

of the arguments advanced at the Bar, this Court is of the opinion

that the petitioner deserves to be enlarged on bail.

Consequently, the bail application is allowed. It is ordered

that the accused-petitioner namely Angrej Singh arrested in

connection with F.I.R. No.43/2017, P.S. Raisinghnagar, District

Sriganganagar shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a

personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and two surety bonds of Rs.25,000/-

each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the

stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and

as and when called upon to do so.

(SANDEEP MEHTA)J.

/tarun goyal/
Sr.P.A

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation