SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Anil Singh vs State Of U.P. on 20 December, 2019


?Court No. – 68

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. – 57318 of 2019

Applicant :- Anil Singh

Opposite Party :- State of U.P.

Counsel for Applicant :- Dwijendra Prasad

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

Hon’ble Bachchoo Lal,J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A and perused the record.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is father-in-law of the deceased. The applicant has falsely been implicated in the present case. The FIR of the alleged incident was lodged against nine persons including the applicant making general allegation. No specific role has been assigned to the applicant. It has further been submitted that at the time of the alleged incident the applicant was living separate from the deceased and her husband. The applicant has no concern with the alleged incident. In first information report it has been mentioned that the date of the marriage of deceased has been shown as 24.2.2014. The real fact is that the marriage of the deceased was solemnized in the year 2012. The deceased has committed suicide herself due to some quarrel in between the husband and wife. The information with regard to the incident was given by husband of the deceased to the informant. The case of the applicant is distinguishable from the case of the husband of the deceased. It has further been submitted that the applicant has falsely been implicated in the present case due to being father of husband of the deceased. There is no direct evidence against the applicant. The applicant has not committed the alleged offence. There is no criminal history of the applicant and is in jail since 19.8.2019.

Per contra, learned A.G.A has opposed the prayer for bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I find it a fit case for bail.

Let the applicant Anil Singh involved in Case Crime No. 114 of 2019, under Sections 498A, Section304B, Section201 IPC and 3/4 D.P. Act, P.S. Eka, District Firozabad be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:-

1. The applicant will not tamper with the evidences.

2. The applicant will not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses and co-operate with the trial.

3. The applicant will appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court unless personal appearance is exempted by the court concerned.

In case of breach of any conditions mentioned above, the trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of the applicant.

Order Date :- 20.12.2019/A.



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation