SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Ankan Suri vs State & Anr. on 13 July, 2018

$~39
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

% Judgment delivered on: 13.07.2018
+ CRL.M.C. 3440/2018
ANKAN SURI ….. Petitioner
versus

STATE ANR ….. Respondents
.
Advocates who appeared in this case:
For the Petitioner : Mr. Mohit Gupta with Mr. Diwij Soni and Mr.
Rohit Aggarwal, Advocates with petitioner in
person.

For the Respondent: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for the State.
SI Satishy Lohia, PS Hauz Khas.
Mr. Pramod Saigal, Advocate for R-2.
CORAM:-
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA
JUDGMENT

13.07.2018

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL)

Crl.M.A.12491/2018 (exemption)

Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions.
CRL.M.C. 3440/2018

1. The petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.141/2017 under
Sections 498A/406/34 IPC, Police Station Hauz Khas.

CRL.M.C. 3440/2018 Page 1 of 3

2. The subject FIR emanates out of matrimonial discord.
Petitioner is the husband of respondent No.2.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the parties have
settled their disputes through the process of mediation held before
Mediation Centre, Saket Courts on 17.07.2017. The parties have
already been divorced by way of a decree of divorce by mutual
consent, passed on 28.02.2018.

4. Respondent No.2 was to be paid a total sum of Rs.10,00,000/-
in full and final settlement of all her claims. A sum of Rs.7,00,000/-
has already been paid. The balance sum of Rs.3,00,000/- has been
paid to the respondent No.2 by way of Pay Order No.091009 dated
13.07.2018 drawn on Standard Chartered Bank.

5. The respondent No.2 is present in person, represented by
counsel and is identified by the Investigating Officer. She submits that
she has settled her disputes with the petitioner and does not wish to
press charges against the petitioner and prosecute the complaint any
further.

6. In view of the fact that the proceedings emanate out of a
matrimonial discord and the parties have fully and finally settled their
disputes and the respondent No.2 has stated that she does not wish to
press the complaint any further and the fact that the parties have
already been divorced by way of a decree of divorce by mutual

CRL.M.C. 3440/2018 Page 2 of 3
consent, passed on 28.02.2018, continuation of criminal proceedings
will be an exercise in futility and justice in the case demands that the
dispute between the parties is put to an end and peace is restored;
securing the ends of justice being the ultimate guiding factor. It would
be expedient to quash the subject FIR and the consequent proceedings
emanating there from.

7. In view of the above, the petition is allowed. FIR No.141/2017
under
Sections 498A/406/34 IPC, Police Station Hauz Khas and the
consequent proceedings emanating there from are quashed.

8. Order Dasti under the signatures of the Court Master.

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J
JULY 13, 2018
st

CRL.M.C. 3440/2018 Page 3 of 3

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2018 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please to read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registrationJOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women centric biased laws like False 498A, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307,312, 313,323 376, 377, 406, 420, 506, 509; and also TEP, RTI etc

Web Design BangladeshWeb Design BangladeshMymensingh