HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 3994 / 2017
1. Ankit Awasthi S/o Shri Ram Kumar Awasthi, Aged About 27
Years, Resident of Chak 4 JSD, Jetsar, Tehsil Vijaynagar, District
Sri Ganganagar.
2. Ram Kumar Awasthi S/o Shri Radha Krishan Awasthi, Resident
of Chak 4 JSD, Jetsar, Tehsil Vijaynagar, District Sri Ganganagar.
3. Meera Awasthi W/o Shri Ram Kumar Awasthi, Resident of Chak
4 JSD, Jetsar, Tehsil Vijaynagar, District Sri Ganganagar.
—-Petitioners
Versus
1. State of Rajasthan Through Public Prosecutor.
2. Rashmi Upadhyay D/o Shri Narendra Mohan, Resident of MD- 7,
Mansarovar Colony, Behind Nosegay School, Sri Ganganagar.
—-Respondents
__
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Lokesh Mathur
For Respondent(s) : Mr. M.S. Panwar, PP
__
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
17/11/2017
1. The petitioners have preferred this criminal misc.
petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR
No.0123/2017 registered at Police Station Mahila Thana, District
Sri Ganganagar for the offences under Sections 498A 406 of
IPC.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the
complete set of allegations have happened only in Uttar Pradesh
which is clear from the bare reading of FIR. It is further stated
that on bare reading of FIR, no specific allegations are there
against the petitioner No.2 3 and the allegations against the
(2 of 2)
[CRLMP-3994/2017]
petitioner No.1 are vague and on the face of it are highly
improbable.
3. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners states
that the petitioners want to submit a representation alongwith all
the relevant documents before the concerned investigating
authority.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor assures this Court that if the
petitioners submit a representation alongwith all the necessary
documents before the concerned investigating authority within a
period of fifteen days from today, then the same shall be
considered and decided strictly in accordance with law, before
completing the investigation.
5. In light of the aforesaid assurance given by learned
Public Prosecutor, the present misc. petition is disposed of with a
direction to the concerned investigating authority that in case the
petitioners submit a representation alongwith all the necessary
documents before it within a period of fifteen days from today,
then the same shall be considered and decided before completing
the investigation, strictly in accordance with law and as per the
assurance given by the learned Public Prosecutor. However, if
during the investigation, the concerned investigating authority
needs to arrest the petitioners, then the petitioners shall be given
15 days notice before making such arrest. The petitioners shall be
at liberty to approach this Court again, in case need arises.
However, it is made clear that the petitioners shall be required to
join and completely co-operate with the investigation.
(DR. PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI)J.
zeeshan/