SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Ankur Jindal & Ors. vs State & Anr. on 6 March, 2020

$~01

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Date of decision: March 06, 2020

+ W.P.(CRL) 535/2020 and CRL.M.A. 4032/2020

ANKUR JINDAL ORS. ….. Petitioners
Through Mr. Sahil Munjal and Mr. Prateek
Goswami, Advocates alongwith
petitioners in person
versus
STATE ANR. ….. Respondents
Through Ms. Anand Thumbayil, Advocate
for Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing
Counsel (Criminal) for the State
with SI Neeraj, P.s.: Shalimar
Bagh, Delhi
Mr. S.P. Aggarwal, Ms. Shashi
Kaushik and Mr. Khem Chand,
Advocates for respondent no.2 /
complainant alongwith respondent
no.2/complainant in person
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE BRIJESH SETHI
JUDGMENT

BRIJESH SETHI, J (oral)

The petitioners have filed the present petition under Section 482 of
the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for quashing of FIR No.
W.P.(Crl.) 535/2020 Page 1 of 4
0090/2017, under Sections 406/498A/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860,
registered at P.S.: Shalimar Bagh and the proceedings emanating
therefrom.

The Investigating Officer, who is present in Court, has identified
the petitioners as well as respondent no.2.

The petitioners and respondent no.2 have submitted that they have
settled their disputes vide Memorandum of Understanding dated 15th
November, 2019. The parties have already obtained divorce by mutual
consent on 28.01.2020. The settlement amount was Rs. 60,00,000/-, out
of which Rs. 20,00,000/- has been paid to respondent no.2 at the time of
first motion and Rs. 20,00,000/- has further been paid to respondent no.2
at the time of second motion and two demand drafts of Rs. 10,00,000/-
(each) have been handed over to respondent no.2 today in the court.
Copy of the said demand drafts has been placed on record.

Respondent no.2 reiterates the aforesaid facts and submits that she
has amicably settled her dispute without any pressure or coercion from
any source whatsoever. Respondent no.2 has further submitted that she
has no objection if the FIR is quashed and the petition is allowed.

In view of the above settlement arrived at between the parties, this
Court is of the view that no fruitful purpose would be served in keeping
the parties entangled in the criminal proceedings. Accordingly, in the
interest of justice, FIR No. 0090/2017, under Sections 406/498A/34 of
the IPC, registered at P.S.: Shalimar Bagh and the proceedings emanating
therefrom are quashed.

W.P.(Crl.) 535/2020 Page 2 of 4

Petition alongwith pending application is disposed of accordingly.
Dasti.

(BRIJESH SETHI)
JUDGE
MARCH 06, 2020
savita

W.P.(Crl.) 535/2020 Page 3 of 4
W.P.(Crl.) 535/2020 Page 4 of 4

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation