SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Anu Mohan vs State Of Kerala on 26 April, 2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK MENON

FRIDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF APRIL 2019 / 6TH VAISAKHA, 1941

Bail Appl..No. 2664 of 2019

CRIME NO. 381/2019 OF POOVAR POLICE STATION , THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.12:

1 ANU MOHAN,
AGED 27 YEARS,
S/O MOHAN, ANU VILLA, KILLY, KOLLODU P.O.,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2 ANITHAKUMARI,
W/O. MOHAN, ANU VILLA, KILLY, KOLLODU P.O.,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

BY ADV. SRI.M.R.SASITH

RESPONDENTS:
1 STATE OF KERALA,
REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF
KERALA, ERNAKULAM

2 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
POOVAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

OTHER PRESENT:
SRI C K PRASAD PP

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26.04.2019,
THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Bail Appl..No. 2664 of 2019

2

O R D E R

Petitioners are the accused in Crime

No.381/2019 of Poovar Police Station,

Thiruvananthapuram for offences punishable under

Sections 498A and Section34 of IPC. The de facto

complainant is the wife of the 1st petitioner.

2. The allegation is that the petitioners

in furtherance of common intention, harassed the

de facto complainant demanding gold and money

and they misappropriated the gold ornaments and

pledged it. She was also physically assaulted

and harassed by the petitioners in demand for

dowry. The 1st petitioner is employed in

Bangalore and the couple have one child.

3. There is a counter allegation of the 2nd

petitioner being harassed and assaulted by the

de facto complainant, regarding which a copy of

the medical certificate is produced, which would

show that she had sustained some swelling
Bail Appl..No. 2664 of 2019

3

injuries. Petitioners have no criminal

antecedents. They are willing to co-operate

with the investigation. There is no possibility

of the petitioners absconding. Therefore,

custodial interrogation of the petitioners may

not be necessary.

In the result, bail application is allowed

on the following conditions:

1.In the event of the petitioners being
arrested, they shall be released on
bail on each of the petitioners
executing a bond for a sum of ₹50,000/-
(Rupees fifty thousand only) with two
solvent sureties each for the like sum
to the satisfaction of the
Investigating Officer.

2. They shall appear before the
Investigating Officer as and when call
for.

3. They shall not try to intimidate or
attempt to influence the witnesses or
Bail Appl..No. 2664 of 2019

4

in any way tamper with evidence.

If the petitioners violate any of the above

conditions, the prosecution is at liberty to

move for cancellation of the bail.

Sd/-

ASHOK MENON,JUDGE

Pn

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2020 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation