IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No 10759 of 2012
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -0 Year- null Thana -null District- NALANDA (BIHARSHARIFF)
1. Archana Kumari D/O Prof. Vidya Sagar R/O Hilsa ( Town ), P.S. Hilsa, District
2. Pankaj Kumar S/O Prof. Vidya Sagar R/O Hilsa ( Town ), P.S. Hilsa, District –
…. …. Petitioner/s
The State Of Bihar
…. …. Opposite Party/s
For the Petitioner/s : Mr Rana Baljit Singh, Advocate
For the S t a t e : Ms Meena Singh, APP
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned
counsel for the complainant and learned APP for the State.
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners
that only general and omnibus allegations have been made against the
petitioners who are Nanad and Devar respectively of the victim.
Learned counsel for the complainant pointed out, with
reference to paragraphs 6 and 13 of the complaint petition that
specific allegations have been made against the two petitioners and, as
such, there is no ground for quashing the order dated 11.06.2010
taking cognizance of the offence under Sections 498A, 406, 323, 379,
504/34 of Indian Penal code.
Patna High Court Cr.M isc. No.10759 of 2012 dt.14-03-2018
On going through the complaint petition, this Court finds
that there is sufficient material to arrive at a prima facie conclusion for
taking cognizance and, as such, the order taking cognizance,
impugned in the instant petition, does not suffer from any infirmity.
This application is dismissed.
(Madhuresh Prasad, J)
CAV DATE NA
Uploading Date 14.03.2018