HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail No. 2317 / 2017
Arun Goyal S/o Sh. Ghanshyamdas Goyal,, Resident of 1-94,
Malviya Nagar, Jaipur (raj)
State of Rajasthan Through Public Prosecutor.
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vineet Jain
For Respondent(s) : Mr. A.S.Rathore, P.P.
For Complainant : Mr. Hemant Jain
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA
This anticipatory bail application has been filed by the
petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with F.I.R.
No.8/2017, Police Station Mahila Thana, Sri Ganganagar for the
offences under Sections 406, 498A and 377 IPC.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public
Prosecutor. Perused the material on record.
There is ample evidence on the record to show that the
petitioner deposited huge sums of money in the saving account of
the complainant. She was also made a Director in the petitioner’s
company and immoveable property purchased in her name. The
petitioner has appeared for investigation. As requested by the
learned counsel, the parties were directed to appear before
Mediator at the Mediation Centre, Jodhpur on 12.4.2017. However,
the complainant failed to appear for mediation.
(2 of 2)
Having regard to the entirety of facts and circumstances as
available on record and upon a consideration of the arguments
advanced at the bar, this Court is of the opinion that it is a fit case
for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner under Section 438
Accordingly, the bail application is allowed and it is directed
that in the event of arrest of petitioner Arun Goyal in connection
with F.I.R. No.8/2017, Police Station Mahila Thana, Sri
Ganganagar, the petitioner shall be released on bail; provided he
furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- along with
two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the
concerned Investigating Officer/S.H.O. on the following
(i). that the petitioner(s) shall make himself available for
interrogation by a police officer as and when required;
(ii). that the petitioner(s) shall not directly or indirectly make any
inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with
the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing
such facts to the court or any police officer; and
(iii). that the petitioner(s) shall not leave India without previous
permission of the court.
(SANDEEP MEHTA), J.