SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Aryadas Murali vs The State Of Kerala on 9 January, 2020

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR

THURSDAY, THE 09TH DAY OF JANUARY 2020 / 19TH POUSHA, 1941

Bail Appl..No.8923 OF 2019

CRIME NO.1742/2019 OF POOYAPALLY POLICE STATION , KOLLAM

PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 TO 3:

1 ARYADAS MURALI,
AGED 32,
S/O.MURALIDHARAN, SOUPARNIKA, MALAPEROOR, KOTTUKAL,
POOYAPPALY, KOTTARAKARA, KOLLAM, PIN- 691306.

2 SUDHAMANI,
AGED 56,
W/O.MURALIDHARAN, SOUPARNIKA, MALAPEROOR, KOTTUKAL,
POOYAPPALY, KOTTARAKARA, KOLLAM, PIN- 691306.

3 MURALIDHARAN NAIR,
AGED 67,
SOUPARNIKA, MALAPEROOR, KOTTUKAL, POOYAPPALY,
KOTTARAKARA, KOLLAM, PIN- 691306.

BY ADVS.
SRI.K.B.PRADEEP
SRI.SREERAJ M.D.
SRI.HARISANKAR R

RESPONDENTS/STATE AND COMPLAINANT:

1 THE STATE OF KERALA,
REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF
KERALA- 682031.

2 THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER,
POOYAPALLI POLICE STATION, KOLLAM DISTRICT- 691001.

SRI AMJAD ALI, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
09.01.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Bail Appl..No.8923 OF 2019

2

Bail Application No.8923 of 2019

———————————————-

ORDER

This is an application for anticipatory bail under

Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

2. The petitioners are accused 1 to 3 in Crime

No.1742 of 2019 of Pooyappalli Police Station registered under

Sections 498A, 406 and 323 read with Section 34 of the Indian

Penal Code. The case is registered at the instance of the wife

of the first petitioner alleging harassment and assault for

dowry.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners as

also the learned Public Prosecutor.

4. The materials on record indicate that the case

arose on account of the matrimonial discord. In the

circumstances, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the

petitioners on the following conditions:

i) The petitioners shall make themselves available
for interrogation before the Investigating Officer
within seven days from today. They shall also make
themselves available for interrogation before the
Investigating Officer as and when directed by the
Investigating Officer in writing to do so;

Bail Appl..No.8923 OF 2019

3

ii) If the petitioners are arrested prior to, or after
their appearance before the Investigating Officer in
terms of this order, they shall be released from
custody on execution of bond for Rs.25,000/- each
with two sureties each for the like sum.

(iii) The petitioners shall not influence or intimidate
the prosecution witnesses nor shall they attempt to
tamper with the evidence of the prosecution.

iv) The petitioners shall not involve in any other
offence while on bail.

Sd/-

P.B.SURESH KUMAR, JUDGE.

DK

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2020 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation