501-wp-2760.2017.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

WRIT PETITION NO.2760 OF 2017

Mr. Ashish Prakash Bhansali and Ors. … Petitioners

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and Ors. … Respondents

Adv. Swati Jadhav and Adv Rajendra Anbhule for the applicant.

Adv. D’souza for respondent no. 1.

Mr. K.V. Saste, APP for respondent State.

CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI
SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ.

DATE : NOVEMBER 22, 2018

P.C.:

Not on board. Taken on production board.

2. Petitioner no.1 husband is present with his counsel.

Respondent no. 3 original complainant is present with her counsel.

Parties jointly request for quashing of the FIR in respect of the CR

No. 131 of 2016 and R.C.C. 1640 of 2016 under section 498A, 406,

323, 504, 506 and 34 of I.P.C. as also under section 66(C) and

66(E) of the Information Technology Act, 2000.

3. Respondent no.3 has filed affidavit accordingly in court and

he has accepted the correctness thereof.

nilegaonkar 1/2

::: Uploaded on – 26/11/2018 27/11/2018 00:08:31 :::
501-wp-2760.2017.doc

4. Parties state that they are also securing divorce by mutual
consent.

5. In view of these developments, we make the rule absolute

and quash and set aside C.R. No. 131 of 2016 and R.C.C. No. 1640

of 2016.

6. Copy is expedited.

(SARANG V. KOTWAL,J.) (B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)

nilegaonkar 2/2

::: Uploaded on – 26/11/2018 27/11/2018 00:08:31 :::