IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT
Bail Application (CRMA 11152/2018)
Criminal Appeal No. 357 of 2018
Ashok Singh ……Appellant/applicant
State of Uttarakhand …….Respondent
Mr. Atul Kumar Bansal, Advocate, for the
Ms. Pushpa Bhatt, Deputy Advocate General, for the
Hon’ble Narayan Singh Dhanik, J. (Oral)
Counter affidavit is taken on the record.
Miscellaneous application (IA 11240/2018) made
therefor stands disposed of.
Heard learned Counsel for the parties on the
bail application and also perused the record.
Vide impugned judgment and order dated
28.9.2018 passed by the Special Sessions Judge,
Udham Singh Nagar (Rudrapur) in Sessions Trial No.
108/2012, the appellant/applicant has been convicted
for the offence under Section 377 IPC and sentenced to
undergo ten years rigorous imprisonment and to pay a
fine of rupees ten thousand.
On 1.3.2012, an FIR was lodged against the
appellant that he committed carnal intercourse against
the order of nature with a ten year old boy. After
investigation police submitted the chargesjeet and after
the trial, the appellant has been convicted for the said
Having gone through the record and considering
the arguments put forth by learned Counsel for the
parties, I find no ground to grant bail to the
convict/appellant who has been convicted for such a
Consequently, the bail application moved on
behalf of the convict/appellant is hereby rejected.
(Narayan Singh Dhanik, J.)