SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Ashwani Kumar vs State on 14 August, 2018

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail No. 2373/2018

Ashwani Kumar S/o Sh. Krashan Chandra, B/c Jat, R/o
Deengarh, Tehsil And District Hanumangarh.

—-Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Rajasthan

—-Respondent

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manish Dadhich
For Respondent(s) : Mr. K. V. Vyas, PP
Mr. Vineet Jain, for the complainant

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR

Order

14/08/2018
This application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the

petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with F.I.R.

No.269/2016, Police Station Mahila, Shri Ganganagar, District Shri

Ganganagar for the offences under Sections 406, 498A, 354, 377,

420, 467, 468, 471 120B of the IPC.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for

the complainant and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the

material available on record.

The learned Public Prosecutor learned counsel for the

complainant have vehemently opposed the bail.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and

upon a consideration of the arguments advanced, this Court is of

the opinion that it is a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail to the

petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

(2 of 2) [CRLMB-2373/2018]

Accordingly, the bail application is allowed and it is directed

that in the event of arrest of petitioner Ashwani Kumar S/o Sh.

Krashan Chandra, in connection with F.I.R. No.269/2016, Police

Station Mahila, Shri Ganganagar, District Shri Ganganagar, the

petitioner shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a

personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- along with two sureties

of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the concerned

Investigating Officer/S.H.O. on the following conditions :-

(I) that the petitioner shall make himself available for
interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

(ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any
inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with
the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing
such facts to the court or any police officer; and

(iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous
permission of the court.

(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J
Solanki Sunil/-

61

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2018 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please to read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registrationJOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women centric biased laws like False 498A, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307,312, 313,323 376, 377, 406, 420, 506, 509; and also TEP, RTI etc

Web Design BangladeshWeb Design BangladeshMymensingh