SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Asif Aslam vs Unknown on 29 March, 2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALEXANDER THOMAS

FRIDAY ,THE 29TH DAY OF MARCH 2019 / 8TH CHAITHRA, 1941

Bail Appl..No. 2333 of 2019
CRIME NO. 542/2019 OF ALUVA POLICE STATION , ERNAKULAM

PETITIONERS/ACCUSED:

1.ASIF ASLAM
AGED 35 YEARS
S/O.V.P.ASLAM,VELLAPPALLIPARAMBIL HOUSE,
ERUTTUPATTA, KOTTAYAM-686124.

2.V.P.ASLAM,
AGED 65 YEARS
VELLAPPALLIPARAMBIL HOUSE,
ERUTTUPATTA, KOTTAYAM-686124.

3.HAZEENA,
AGED 62 YEARS
W/O V.P.ASLAM
AGED 65 YEARS
VELLAPPALLIPARAMBIL HOUSE,
ERUTTUPATTA, KOTTAYAM-686124.

BY ADVS.
SRI.T.B.SHAJIMON
SMT.GOVINDU P.RENUKADEVI

RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT

STATE OF KERALA
REP.BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KERALA,ERNAKULAM.

SRI.SAIGI JACOB PALATTY, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29.03.2019,
THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
B.A.No.2333 of 2019
2

ALEXANDER THOMAS, J.

B.A.No.2333 of 2019

Dated this the 29th day of March, 2019

ORDER

The petitioners are accused in Crime No.542 of 2019 of Aluva Police

Station, which has been registered for offence punishable under Sec.498A

of the IPC.

2. The gist of the prosecution case is that the petitioners had

physically and mentally harassed the lady de facto complainant by asking

more dowry, etc. The 1st petitioner is the husband of the lady de facto

complainant and the petitioners 2 and 3 are the parents of the 1st petitioner.

3. Having regard to the nature of the allegations raised against the

petitioners, this Court is inclined to consider the plea for anticipatory bail.

Accordingly, it is ordered that in the event of the petitioners being arrested

by police in connection with the abovesaid crime, they shall be released on

bail on their executing a bond for Rs.40,000/- each and on furnishing two

solvent sureties for the like sum, both to the satisfaction of the

Investigating Officer concerned.

B.A.No.2333 of 2019
3

(a) Petitioners shall not involve in any criminal offences of similar nature.

(b) Petitioners shall fully co-operate with the investigation.

(c) Petitioners shall report before the Investigating Officer as and when
required in that connection.

(d) Petitioners shall not influence witness or shall not tamper or attempt
to tamper evidence in any manner, whatsoever.

4. If the petitioners do not comply with the directions, then the
benefit of the directions issued by this Court will automatically stand
vacated without any further orders.

5. If the petitioners violate all or any of the bail conditions, then
the jurisdictional court concerned will stand hereby authorised, to
consider the plea for cancellation of bail, if required, in accordance with
law.

With these observations and directions, the above Bail Application

will stand disposed of.

Sd/-

ALEXANDER THOMAS
JUDGE
vgd

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2020 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation