SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Atul Kaushik vs State Of Punjab on 21 August, 2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M No.22094 of 2019
Date of decision: 21st August, 2019

Atul Kaushik
… Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
… Respondent

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE FATEH DEEP SINGH

Present: Mr. Aman Pal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. H.S. Grewal, Addl. Advocate General, Punjab
for respondent No.1/State.
Mr. Arun Dogra, Advocate for respondent No.2.

FATEH DEEP SINGH, J. (ORAL)

This order shall dispose off first anticipatory bail application

filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. by petitioner Atul Kaushik in case

bearing FIR No.110 dated 16.04.2019 registered at Police Station

Zirakpur, District Mohali under Sections 406, Section498A, Section323 IPC.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance

of the orders of interim bail dated 15.05.2019 passed by this Court, the

petitioner has joined investigations which is not controverted by learned

State counsel on instructions from HC Harnek Singh, Police Station

Zirakpur who submits that the petitioner is no longer required for further

investigation and nothing is to be recovered from him and that he has no

objection if the interim order is made absolute, though learned counsel

1 of 2
08-09-2019 05:09:28 :::
CRM-M No.22094 of 2019 2

for the complainant Mr. Arun Dogra, Advocate has opposed the same

strongly on the ground that recovery has not been effected.

In view of what has been stated above and in the light of

orders passed earlier, the interim bail granted to the petitioner vide order

dated 15.05.2019 is made absolute on the same terms and conditions till

submission of report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. (challan). Thereafter, he

will be permitted to furnish regular bail bonds to the satisfaction of the

trial Court.

The petition stands disposed off accordingly.

(FATEH DEEP SINGH)
JUDGE
August 21, 2019
rps
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Whether reportable Yes/No

2 of 2
08-09-2019 05:09:28 :::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation