SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Avirup Mitra vs Unknown on 10 January, 2019

1

M/L No.352
C.R.M. 12 of 2019
10.01.2019

Ct-34
(AD) In Re: – An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of
the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 02/01/2019 in
connection with Nadanghat P.S. Case No. 383 dated
22/12/2018 under Section 498A/325/406 of the Indian Penal
Code.

And

In the matter of: Avirup Mitra
….petitioner.

Mr. Sanjib Mitra
Ms. Sarbani Chakraborty

…for the petitioner.

Mr. S.S. Imam
Mr. S. Kundu

…for the State.

The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in connection with

Nadanghat P.S. Case No. 383 dated 22/12/2018 under Section

498A/325/406 of the Indian Penal Code.

The State points out that the complaint is that the wife

was subjected to inhuman treatment by the petitioning husband

and she was constrained to leave the matrimonial home. The

State also points out that the stridhan articles of the wife have

been wrongfully retained by the petitioner.

The petitioner offers to pay a sum of Rs.5,000/- per

month for the maintenance of his wife. In view of such offer, the

petitioner will make over the payment for the month of January,

2019 by the 20th of this month and continue payments in a

similar manner for the subsequent months. In default of any

payment, the wife will entitle to seek cancellation. If any other

forum passes an order for maintenance or alimony pendente lite

or the like in favour of the wife, the payments made in terms of

this order will be adjusted against the same.

Subject to the payment for the month of the January,

2019 being first made, in the event of arrest, the petitioner is
2

directed to be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of

Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only), with two sureties of

Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand only) each, one of whom must

be local, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer, subject to the

conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal

Procedure, 1973. In addition, the petitioner will report to the

Investigating Officer at such time and place as may be specified

by the concerned police officer, till the investigation is completed.

The investigating Officer is directed to accompany the wife

to the matrimonial home so that the articles pointed out by the

wife as the stridhan articles can be removed from such place and

kept elsewhere subject to the direction of the trial court.

The petition for anticipatory bail is allowed on the

conditions indicated above.

A certified copy of this order be immediately made

available to the petitioner, subject to compliance with all

requisite formalities.

(Sanjib Banerjee, J.)

(Suvra Ghosh, J.)
3

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation