SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Bablu @ Muzammil @ Mozamil vs The State Of Bihar on 6 March, 2020

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.75541 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-474 Year-2019 Thana- ARARIA District- Araria

1. BABLU @ MUZAMMIL @ MOZAMIL Son of Md. Siddique @ Siddique
Resident of Village – Hariyabara, P.S.- Araria R.S.- Distt – Araria.
2. Saddam Son of Md. Siddique @ Siddique. Resident of Village – Hariyabara,
P.S.- Araria R.S.- Distt – Araria.
3. Md. Mohatmil @ Motmmim Son of Md. Siddique @ Siddique. Resident of
Village – Hariyabara, P.S.- Araria R.S.- Distt – Araria.

… … Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
… … Opposite Party/s

Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Anil Prasad Singh
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ram Sumiran Rai

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN
ORAL ORDER

4 06-03-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for
the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest for the offences alleged
under Sections 147, 149, 342, 323, 324, 379, 354, 504 of the Indian
Penal Code registered in connection with Araria (R.S.) P.S. Case No.
474 of 2019.

3. It is submitted that the petitioners have been falsely
implicated on the accusation of having committed assault on the
informant by the petitioners, whose sister was married to the
informant. It is submitted that there is nothing to indicate that any
grievous injury has been caused to the informant. The averments in
the FIR do not constitute the ingredients of the offences under Section
354 IPC and the allegation under 379 IPC is mere embellishment. The
petitioner claims clean antecedents.

4. Learned APP on the basis of case diary submits that there
is direct accusation of assault by the petitioner. The injury report
however shows the injuries to be simple in nature.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75541 of 2019(4) dt.06-03-2020
2/2

5. Be that as it may, in the event of the petitioners’ arrest or
surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of
communication of this order, let the above named petitioners’ be
released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand)
each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of
learned CJM, Araria, in connection with Araria (R.S.) P.S. Case No. 474
of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2)
Cr.P.C. and also subject to the following further conditions:

i. That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioners

ii. That the petitioners shall not indulge in any similar offence till
conclusion of the trial.

iii. That the petitioners shall co-operate with the investigation, if not
already concluded, and make themselves available as and when so
required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for
cancellation of bail.

iv. The petitioners shall remain physically present in Court on each
and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two
consecutive dates without sufficient reason, their bail bonds shall be
liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Vikash Jain, J)

Chandran/-

U T

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2020 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation