1
28.02.2019
CRR 3560 of 2018
Ct. No. 29
In the matter of:- Baijnath Mahato …petitioner
Mr. Subhasish Pachhal,
Ms. Dipa Bhattacharya (Sarma).
…for the petitioner.
Ms. Baisali Basu
…for the State.
The learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner
submits that the petitioner is praying for an expeditious disposal of a
proceeding in which a charge sheet has been submitted under Sections
323 and 498A of the Indian Penal Code.
Let a copy of this application be served upon Ms. Baisali Basu,
learned Advocate who is present in Court today and who ordinarily appears
on behalf of the State. Her engagement may be regularised by the
competent authority of the State in due course.
The learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner
submits that a First Information Report was lodged in this case on 22nd
May, 2013 and a charge sheet was submitted on 15th June, 2013. He
submits that thereafter the proceeding has dragged on for no fault of the
petitioner. He submits that the petitioner is a government employee and it
would be interest of everyone if the proceeding is expedited.
I have heard the submissions of the learned Advocates appearing
on behalf of the petitioner as well as for the State and have perused the
revision petition.
In the interest of justice, I direct the learned Trial Court to
conclude the proceedings as expeditiously as possible without granting any
unnecessary adjournment to any of the parties preferably within a period of
one year from the next date of hearing.
The revisional application is disposed of.
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order may be supplied to
the parties expeditiously, if applied for.
(Jay Sengupta, J.)
2
