SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Balram Sharma vs State Of Haryana And Another on 6 April, 2018

CRM No.M-28678 of 2017


Criminal Misc. No. M- 28678 of 2017(OM)
Date of Decision: April 06 , 2018.

Balram Sharma …… PETITIONER(s)


State of Haryana and another …… RESPONDENT (s)


Present: Mr. Ashit Malik, Advocate
for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashok S.Chaudhary, Addl.AG, Haryana.

None for respondent No.2.


Prayer in this petition is for quashing of FIR No.178 dated

13.05.2016 under Sections 354/377/406/498A/506 IPC, registered at Police

Station Bhupani, District Faridabad and all other consequential proceedings

arising therefrom on the basis of a compromise arrived at between the parties.

The abovesaid FIR was registered at the instance of respondent No.2

due to matrimonial discord with her husband i.e., the petitioner. With the

intervention of respectables and relatives, a compromise was arrived at between

the parties, the terms of which were reduced into writing on 08.07.2017

(Annexure P2).

The petitioner and respondent No.2 decided to part ways. It is

1 of 4
10-04-2018 08:49:04 :::
CRM No.M-28678 of 2017

informed that petition under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 filed

by them has since been allowed on 11.01.2018. The entire settled amount has

been handed over to respondent No.2.

Copy of decision dated 11.01.2018, furnished in Court today, is

taken on record subject to just exceptions.

This Court on 04.10.2017 directed the parties to appear before

learned trial court for recording their statements in respect to the above-

mentioned compromise. Learned trial court was directed to submit a report

regarding the genuineness of the compromise, as to whether it has been arrived at

out of the free will and volition of the parties without any coercion, fear or undue

influence. Learned trial court was also directed to intimate whether the petitioner

is absconding/proclaimed offender and whether any other case is pending against

him. Information was sought as to whether all affected persons are a party to the


Pursuant to order dated 04.10.2017, the parties appeared before the

learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Faridbad and their statements were

recorded on 23.10.2017. Respondent No.2 stated that the matter has been

amicably resolved by her with the petitioner, out of her own free will without any

pressure or coercion and she has no objection in case the abovesaid FIR against

the accused petitioner is quashed. Statement of the petitioner in respect to the

settlement was recorded as well. Statement of ASI Maya Rani, Women Cell NIT

Zone, Faridabad was recorded to the effect that the petitioner is not a proclaimed


As per report dated 23.10.2017 received from the learned Judicial

2 of 4
10-04-2018 08:49:05 :::
CRM No.M-28678 of 2017

Magistrate First Class, Faridabad, satisfaction is expressed that the compromise

between the parties is genuine, arrived at without any threat, coercion or undue

pressure from any quarter. The petitioner is not reported to be a proclaimed

offender. Statements of the parties are appended alongwith the said report.

Mr. Himanshu Arora, Advocate for Mr. Manoj Bajaj, Advocate had

appeared on behalf of respondent No.2 before this Court on 04.10.2017. He

affirmed and verified the factum of settlement between the parties and submitted

that respondent No.2 has no objection to the quashing of the abovementioned FIR

against the petitioner, pursuant to which, the parties were directed learned trial

court for recording of their statements in respect to the compromise.

Learned counsel for the State submits that as the abovesaid FIR

arises out of a matrimonial dispute, the State has no objection to the quashing of

the FIR in question as well as all consequential proceedings on the basis of a

settlement arrived at between the parties.

In Kulwinder Singh and others versus State of Punjab and another

2007 (3) R.C.R. (Criminal) 1052, a five member Bench of this Court has

observed as under:-

“The compromise, in a modern society, is the sine qua non of
harmony and orderly behaviour. It is the soul of justice and if the
power under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code is used to
enhance such a compromise which, in turn, enhances the social
amity and reduces friction, then it truly is “finest hour of justice”.

The Hon’ble Supreme Court in B.S.Joshi and others v. State of

Haryana, 2003(4) SCC 675 has observed that it becomes the duty of the Court to

encourage genuine settlements of matrimonial disputes.

3 of 4
10-04-2018 08:49:05 :::
CRM No.M-28678 of 2017

Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of this case, it would be

in the interest of justice to quash the abovesaid FIR as no useful purpose would

be served by continuance of the present proceedings. It will merely lead to

wastage of precious time of the court and would be an exercise in futility.

This petition is, thus, allowed and FIR No.178 dated 13.05.2016

under Sections 354/377/406/498A/506 IPC, registered at Police Station Bhupani,

District Faridabad alongwith all consequential proceedings are, hereby, quashed.

April 6 , 2018. JUDGE

Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No
Whether reportable: Yes/No

4 of 4
10-04-2018 08:49:05 :::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation