SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Basheer Ahamed vs The State Of Karnataka on 27 September, 2019

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2019

BEFORE

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JOHN MICHAEL CUNHA

CRIMINAL PETITION No. 5224/2016

BETWEEN:

1. Basheer Ahamed
S/o Late Ajij Sab,
Age 65 years,
Occ : Retired Serviceman,
R/o Mehaboob Nagara,
Sira Town,
Tumkur District – 572 137.

2. Mehaboob John
@ Jubedha Khanam,
W/o Basheer Ahamed,
Age 58 years,
Occ : House Wife,
R/o Mehaboob Nagara,
Sira Town,
Tumkur District – 572 137.

3. Kalikha
S/o Ajampasha,
Aged 53 years,
Occ : Laborer,
R/o Huliyaru,
C.N.Hally Taluk,
Tumkur District – 572 214.

4. Sadiq Pasha
S/o Basheer Ahamed,
2

Age 31 years,
Occ : Student,
R/o Parkmohalla,
Sira Town,
Tumkur District – 572 137.

5. Shameen Taj
D/o Basheer Ahamed,
Age 29 years,
Occ : House Wife,
R/o Parkmohalla,
Sira Town,
Tumkur District – 572 137.

6. Shabbir
S/o Ameer @ Lamaniameersab,
Age 35 years,
Occ : Business,
R/o Parkmohalla,
Sira Town,
Tumkur District – 572 137.

7. Navaz Pasha
S/o Basheer Ahamed,
Age 26 years,
Occ : Electrician,
R/o Parkmohalla, Sira Town,
Tumkur District – 572 137.
… Petitioners
(By Sri.R.B.Deshpande, Advocate – Absent)

AND:

1. The State of Karnataka
By Sira Police Station,
Tumkur District – 572 137.

(Represented by State Public Prosecutor,
High Court Buildings, Bengaluru – 560 001)
3

2. Hassenabanu
W/o Javeed Pasha,
Age 31 years,
R/o Parkmohalla, Sira Town,
Tumkur District – 572 137.
… Respondents
(By Sri.Vijayakumar Majage, Addl.SPP for R1;
Sri.Mushtaq Ahmed, Advocate for R2)

This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of
Cr.P.C praying to quash the entire proceedings against the
petitioners in C.C.No.566/2013 (initiated for offences P/U/S
506, 498A, 504, 143, 147, 323, 324, 114 read with 149 of
SectionIPC and Sections 3, 4 of D.P.Act pending on the file of
Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Court, Sira, Tumkuru District.

This Criminal petition coming on for Admission, this
day, the Court made the following:

ORDER

None appears on behalf of the petitioners. Even on

06.08.2019, none appeared for the petitioners indicating

that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the

petition.

Hence, petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Sd/-

JUDGE
UN

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2020 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation