SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Bharat @ Bhado Laxmanbhai Odedra vs State Of Gujarat on 4 October, 2017

R/CR.MA/23904/2017 ORDER


23904 of 2017

STATE OF GUJARAT….Respondent(s)

MR PREMAL S RACHH, ADVOCATE for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MS MAITHILI D MEHTA, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1


Date : 04/10/2017

1. RULE. Ms. Maithili D. Mehta, learned Additional Public

Prosecutor waives service of rule on behalf of the


2. This application is filed by the applicant under Section 439

of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for regular bail in

connection with FIR registered at C.R. No.I-23/2016 with

Kalyanpur Police Station, Devbhoomi Dwarka for the

offence punishable under Sections 363, 366, 376, 212, 114

of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 12 of the

Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act.

3. Learned advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant

submits that considering the nature of offence, the

applicant may be enlarged on regular bail by imposing

suitable conditions.

Page 1 of 4

HC-NIC Page 1 of 4 Created On Sat Oct 07 13:27:11 IST 2017
R/CR.MA/23904/2017 ORDER

4. On the other hand, the learned Additional Public

Prosecutor appearing for the respondent-State has

opposed grant of regular bail looking to the nature and

gravity of the offence.

5. Learned Advocates appearing on behalf of the respective

parties do not press for a further reasoned order.

6. I have heard the learned advocates appearing on behalf of

the respective parties and perused the papers. Following

aspects are considered :-

I) The applicant and the prosecutrix are now happily

married and are having 8 month old child out of the wed-


II) The registration certificate is on record at Annexure-C

and the birth certificate of the daughter is also on record;

III) Considering the affidavit in support filed by the

prosecutrix at Annexure-D;

This Court has taken into consideration the law laid down

by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay Chandra

v. Central Bureau of Investigation reported in [2012] 1

SCC 40.

7. In the facts and circumstances of the case and considering

the nature of the allegations made against the applicant in

Page 2 of 4

HC-NIC Page 2 of 4 Created On Sat Oct 07 13:27:11 IST 2017
R/CR.MA/23904/2017 ORDER

the First Information Report, without discussing the

evidence in detail, prima facie, this Court is of the opinion

that this is a fit case to exercise the discretion and enlarge

the applicant on regular bail.

8. Hence, the present application is allowed. The applicant is

ordered to be released on regular bail in connection with

C.R. No.I-23/2016 registered with Kalyanpur Police

Station, Devbhoomi Dwarka on executing a personal

bond of Rs.10,000/ (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with one

surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial

Court and subject to the conditions that he shall;

(a) not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty;

(b) not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the


(c) surrender passport, if any, to the lower Court within a


(d) not leave the State of Gujarat without prior permission

of the Sessions Judge concerned;

(e) mark presence before the concerned Police Station on

alternate Monday of every English calendar month for a

period of six months between 11.00 a.m. and 2.00 p.m.;

(f) furnish the present address of his residence to the

Investigating Officer and also to the Court at the time of

Page 3 of 4

HC-NIC Page 3 of 4 Created On Sat Oct 07 13:27:11 IST 2017
R/CR.MA/23904/2017 ORDER

execution of the bond and shall not change the residence

without prior permission of this Court;

9. The authorities will release the applicant only if he is not

required in connection with any other offence for the time

being. If breach of any of the above conditions is

committed, the Sessions Judge concerned will be free to

issue warrant or take appropriate action in the matter.

10. Bail bond to be executed before the lower Court

having jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the

concerned Court to delete, modify and/or relax any of the

above conditions, in accordance with law.

11. At the trial, the trial Court shall not be influenced by

the observations of preliminary nature qua the evidence at

this stage made by this Court while enlarging the applicant

on bail.

12. The application is allowed in the aforesaid terms.

Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct

Service is permitted.

(A.Y. KOGJE, J.)


Page 4 of 4

HC-NIC Page 4 of 4 Created On Sat Oct 07 13:27:11 IST 2017

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation