SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Bharatbhai Bhavanbhai Parmar vs State Of Gujarat on 15 July, 2019

R/CR.MA/13190/2019 ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 13190 of 2019

BHARATBHAI BHAVANBHAI PARMAR
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT

Appearance:
MR DHARMESH R PATEL(5592) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR MITESH AMIN, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for Respondent(s) No. 1

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIPUL M. PANCHOLI
Date : 15/07/2019
ORAL ORDER

1. Rule. Learned Public Prosecutor Mr.Mitesh
Amin waives service of notice of Rule on
behalf of respondent­State.

2. By way of the present application under
Section 438 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure, 1973, the applicant­accused has
prayed for anticipatory bail in connection
with the FIR being C.R. No.I – 53 of 2019
registered with Sanand Police Station,
District Ahmedabad Rural for the offenses
punishable under Sectionsections 498A, Section323, Section504 and
Section506(2) of IPC.

3. Learned advocate for the applicant submits
that the nature of allegations are such for
which custodial interrogation at this stage
is not necessary. He further submits that the
applicant will keep himself available during
the course of investigation, trial also and

Page 1 of 5

Downloaded on : Tue Jul 16 00:14:00 IST 2019
R/CR.MA/13190/2019 ORDER

will not flee from justice.

4. Learned advocate for the applicant on
instructions states that the applicant is
ready and willing to abide by all the
conditions including imposition of conditions
with regard to powers of Investigating Agency
to file an application before the competent
Court for his remand. He further submit that
upon filing of such application by the
Investigating Agency, the right of applicant
accused to oppose such application on merits
may be kept open. Learned advocate,
therefore, submitted that considering the
above facts, the applicant may be granted
anticipatory bail.

5. Learned Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf
of the respondent – State has opposed grant
of anticipatory bail looking to the nature
and gravity of the offence.

6. Having heard the learned advocates for the
parties and perusing the material placed on
record and taking into consideration the
facts of the case, nature of allegations,
gravity of offences, role attributed to the
accused, without discussing the evidence in
detail, at this stage, I am inclined to grant
anticipatory bail to the applicant.

7. This Court has considered the following

Page 2 of 5

Downloaded on : Tue Jul 16 00:14:00 IST 2019
R/CR.MA/13190/2019 ORDER

aspects:

(a) it is submitted by learned advocate for
the applicant that initially missing
complaint was filed in which no allegation of
offence punishable under Sections 498A, Section323
of IPC are alleged against the applicant.

(b) marriage span of the complainant and
applicant is more than 22 years.
In view of the aforesaid facts and
circumstances of the present case, I am
inclined to consider the case of the
applicant.

8. This Court has also taken into consideration
the law laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court
in the case of Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre
Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors., reported
at [2011] 1 SCC 694, wherein the Hon’ble Apex
Court reiterated the law laid down by the
Constitution Bench in the case of Shri
Gurubaksh Singh Sibbia Ors. Vs. State of
Punjab, reported at (1980) 2 SCC 565.

9. In the result, the present application is
allowed. The applicant is ordered to be
released on bail in the event of his arrest
in connection with a FIR being C.R. No.I – 53
of 2019 registered with Sanand Police
Station, District Ahmedabad Rural on his
executing a personal bond of Rs.10,000/­

Page 3 of 5

Downloaded on : Tue Jul 16 00:14:00 IST 2019
R/CR.MA/13190/2019 ORDER

(Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with one surety of
like amount on the following conditions:

(a) shall cooperate with the investigation
and make himself available for
interrogation whenever required;

(b) shall remain present at concerned Police
Station on 22.07.2019 between 11.00 a.m.
and 2.00 p.m.;

(c) shall not directly or indirectly make
any inducement, threat or promise to any
person acquainted with the fact of the
case so as to dissuade him from
disclosing such facts to the court or to
any police officer;

(d) shall not obstruct or hamper the police
investigation and not to play mischief
with the evidence collected or yet to be
collected by the police;

(e) shall at the time of execution of bond,
furnish the address to the investigating
officer and the court concerned and
shall not change his residence till the
final disposal of the case till further
orders;

(f) shall not leave India without the
permission of the Court and if having
passport shall deposit the same before
the Trial Court within a week; and

(g) it would be open to the Investigating
Officer to file an application for
remand if he considers it proper and
just and the learned Magistrate would
decide it on merits;

10. Despite this order, it would be open for the

Page 4 of 5

Downloaded on : Tue Jul 16 00:14:00 IST 2019
R/CR.MA/13190/2019 ORDER

Investigating Agency to apply to the
competent Magistrate, for police remand of
the applicant. The applicant shall remain
present before the learned Magistrate on the
first date of hearing of such application and
on all subsequent occasions, as may be
directed by the learned Magistrate. This
would be sufficient to treat the accused in
the judicial custody for the purpose of
entertaining application of the prosecution
for police remand. This is, however, without
prejudice to the right of the accused to seek
stay against an order of remand, if,
ultimately, granted, and the power of the
learned Magistrate to consider such a request
in accordance with law. It is clarified that
the applicant, even if, remanded to the
police custody, upon completion of such
period of police remand, shall be set free
immediately, subject to other conditions of
this anticipatory bail order.

11. At the trial, the Trial Court shall not be
influenced by the prima facie observations
made by this Court in the present order.

12. Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid
extent. Direct service is permitted.

(VIPUL M. PANCHOLI, J)
Jani1

Page 5 of 5

Downloaded on : Tue Jul 16 00:14:00 IST 2019

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation