R/CR.MA/14378/2019 ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 14378 of 2019

BHARATBHAI RAJABHAI PARMAR
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT

Appearance:
MR PREMAL S RACHH(3297) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR RONAK RAVAL, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2) for the
Respondent(s) No. 1

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIPUL M. PANCHOLI
Date : 14/08/2019
ORAL ORDER

1. Rule. Learned APP Mr.Ronak Raval waives service
of Rule on behalf of the respondent State.

2. The present application is filed under Section
439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, for
regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R.
No.I­19 of 2019 registered with Khambha Police
Station, District Amreli, for offence under
Sections 498A, Section114 and Section306 of the Indian Penal
Code.

3. Learned advocate appearing on behalf of the
applicant submits that considering the nature of
the offence, the applicant may be enlarged on
regular bail by imposing suitable conditions.

4. Learned APP appearing on behalf of the
respondent­State has opposed grant of regular
bail looking to the nature and gravity of the
offence.

5. Learned advocates appearing on behalf of the
respective parties do not press for further

Page 1 of 4

Downloaded on : Wed Aug 14 22:40:01 IST 2019
R/CR.MA/14378/2019 ORDER

reasoned order.
6. Having heard the learned advocates for the
parties and perusing the material placed on

record and taking into consideration the facts
of the case, nature of allegations, gravity of
offences, role attributed to the accused,
without discussing the evidence in detail, this
Court is of the opinion that this is a fit case
to exercise the discretion and enlarge the
applicant on regular bail.

7. This Court has also considered the following
aspects:

(a) the applicant is in Jail since 17.04.2019;

(b) investigation is concluded and charge­sheet
is filed;

(c) marriage span of the applicant and the
deceased was more than eight years;

(d) this Court has considered the allegations
levelled against the applicant in the FIR in
question;

(e) this Court has also perused the material
placed on record including the affidavit filed
by the first informant; and

(f) looking to the overall facts and
circumstances of the present case, this Court is
inclined to exercise discretion in favour of the
applicant.

8. This Court has also taken into consideration the
law laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the
case of Sanjay Chandra Vs. Central Bureau of
Investigation, reported in (2012) 1 SCC 40.

Page 2 of 4

Downloaded on : Wed Aug 14 22:40:01 IST 2019

R/CR.MA/14378/2019 ORDER

9. Hence, the present application is allowed. The
applicant is ordered to be released on regular
bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No.I­19
of 2019 registered with Khambha Police Station,
District Amreli, on executing a personal bond of
Rs.10,000/­ (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with one
surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of
the trial Court and subject to the conditions
that he shall;

[a] not take undue advantage of liberty or
misuse liberty;

[b] not act in a manner injurious to the
interest of the prosecution;

[c] surrender passport, if any, to the lower
court within a week;

[d] not leave India without prior permission
of the concerned Trial Court;

[e] mark presence before the concerned
Police Station between 1st to 10th day of
every English calendar month for a
period of six months between 11:00 a.m.
and 2:00 p.m.;

[f] furnish the present address of residence
to the Investigating Officer and also to
the Court at the time of execution of
the bond and shall not change the
residence without prior permission of
this Court;

10. The authorities will release the applicant only
if he is not required in connection with any
other offence for the time being. If breach of

Page 3 of 4

Downloaded on : Wed Aug 14 22:40:01 IST 2019
R/CR.MA/14378/2019 ORDER

any of the above conditions is committed, the
Sessions Judge concerned will be free to issue
warrant or take appropriate action in the
matter. Bail bond to be executed before the
lower Court having jurisdiction to try the case.
It will be open for the concerned Court to
delete, modify and/or relax any of the above
conditions, in accordance with law.

11. At the trial, the Trial Court shall not be
influenced by the prima facie observations made
by this Court in the present order.

12. Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent.

Direct service is permitted.

(VIPUL M. PANCHOLI, J)
piyush

Page 4 of 4

Downloaded on : Wed Aug 14 22:40:01 IST 2019