SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Bhargava D. vs State Of Kerala on 29 October, 2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALEXANDER THOMAS

TUESDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2019 / 7TH KARTHIKA, 1941

Bail Appl..No.7490 OF 2019

CRIME NO.360/2019 OF Bekal Police Station , Kasargod

PETITIONER/S:

1 BHARGAVA D., AGED 27 YEARS
S/O.BALAKRISHNA BHATT, R/AT SREEDAVASA,
MOODAMBAIL, DANDAMGADI, MOODAMBALI VILLAGE,
MANJESHWAR TALUK, KASARAGOD DISTRICT.

2 BALAKRISHNA BHATT, AGED 59 YEARS
S/O.SREENIVAS BHAT, R/AT SREEDAVASA,
MOODAMBAIL, DANDAMGADI, MOODAMBAIL VILLAGE,
MANJESHWAR TALUK, KASARAGOD DISTRICT.

3 VANITHA LAKSHMI, AGED 54 YEARS
W/O.BALAKRISHNA BHATT, R/AT SREEDAVASA,
MOODAMBAIL, DANDAMGADI, MOODAMBAIL VILLAGE,
MANJESHWAR TALUK, KASARAGOD DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.A.ARUNKUMAR

RESPONDENT/S:

1 STATE OF KERALA,
REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM – 682 031.

2 THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER,
(CRIME NO.360 OF 2019 OF BEKAL POLICE STATION,
KASARAGOD DISTRICT) 671 318.

OTHER PRESENT:

SRI.AMJAD ALI, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
29.10.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
::2::
Bail Appl..No.7490 OF 2019

ALEXANDER THOMAS, J.
—————————–
B.A.No.7490 Of 2019
———————————
Dated this the 29th day of October, 2019.

ORDER

The petitioners herein have been arrayed as accused

Nos.1 to 3 among the 3 accused in the instant Crime

No.360/2019 of Bekal Police Station, Kasargode District,

which has been registered for offences punishable under

Sec.498A of the SectionI.P.C, on the basis of the FI statement given by

the lady de facto complainant on 12.9.2019 at about 3:20 p.m.,

in respect of the incidents happened for the period from

20.12.2015 to 3.8.2019. The lady de facto complainant is the

wife of the 1st petitioner herein and petitioners 2 3 are the

father and mother respectively of the 1st petitioner.

2. The brief of the prosecution case is that after the

marriage between the spouses, the petitioners have treated the

de facto complainant with cruelty, demanding dowry, money,

etc.

3. Sri.Amjad Ali, learned Prosecutor would fairly

submit on the basis of instructions from the Investigating
::3::

Bail Appl..No.7490 OF 2019

Officer concerned that pursuant to Sec.41A notice issued, the

1st petitioner (A1) appeared before the Investigating Officer for

interrogation purposes and he has fully co-operated with the

interrogation process and that the Investigating Officer does

not intend to arrest any of the petitioners in relation to the

investigation in this Crime.

4. The abovesaid submission made on behalf of the

Investigating Officer is recorded. Hence it is for the

petitioners to work out their remedies in the manner known to

law as the plea for anticipatory bail has become rather

redundant or infructuous in view of the fair stand taken by the

Investigating Officer concerned.

With these observations and directions, the above

application will stand disposed of.

Sd/-

ALEXANDER THOMAS,
Judge.

bkn/-

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2020 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation