SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Bhupinder Singh vs State Of Punjab And Anr on 21 September, 2017

CRM No.M-9975 of 2017 [1]


Criminal Misc. No. M- 9975 of 2017(OM)
Date of Decision: September 21 , 2017.

Bhupinder Singh …… PETITIONER(s)


State of Punjab and another …… RESPONDENT (s)


Present: Mr. Prateek Sodhi, Advocate
for the petitioner.

Mr. Karanbir Singh, AAG, Punjab.

Mr. Umesh Aggarwal, Advocate
for the complainant/respondent No.2.


Prayer in this petition is for quashing of FIR No.0014 dated

29.02.2016 under Section 498A IPC registered at Police Station Women, District

Amritsar City and all other consequential proceedings arising therefrom on the

basis of a compromise arrived at between the parties.

The abovesaid FIR was registered at the instance of respondent No.2

due to matrimonial discord with her husband i.e., the petitioner. With the

intervention of respectables and relatives, a compromise was arrived at between

the parties, the terms of which were reduced into writing on 14.02.2017

(Annexure P3). The petitioner and respondent No.2 decided to part ways. It is

1 of 4
27-09-2017 01:30:02 :::
CRM No.M-9975 of 2017 [2]

informed that petition under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955

preferred by them was allowed yesterday i.e., on 20.09.2017. The entire settled

amount has been handed over to respondent No.2.

This Court on 24.04.2017 directed the parties to appear before

learned Illaqa Magistrate for recording their statements in respect to the above-

mentioned compromise. Liberty was afforded to the petitioner to record his

statement through his power of attorney holder i.e., his mother Smt. Sawinder

Kaur. Learned Illaqa Magistrate was directed to submit a report regarding the

genuineness of the compromise, as to whether it has been arrived at out of the

free will and volition of the parties without any coercion, fear or undue

influence. Learned Illaqa Magistrate was also directed to intimate whether the

petitioner is absconding/proclaimed offender and whether any other case is

pending against him. Information was sought as to whether all affected persons

are a party to the settlement.

Pursuant to order dated 24.04.2017, the parties appeared before the

learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Amritsar and their statements were recorded

on 01.06.2017. Respondent No.2 stated that she has compromised the matter

with the accused petitioner out of her own free will and consent, without any

kind of pressure, coercion or threat. It is further stated that she has no objection

in case the abovesaid FIR is quashed against the accused petitioner. Statement

of the petitioner through his power of attorney holder and mother Smt. Sawinder

Kaur in respect to the settlement was recorded as well.

As per report dated 15.06.2017 received from the learned Chief

Judicial Magistrate, Amritsar, it is opined that the compromise between the

parties is bona fide and genuine, arrived at out of free will of the parties without

2 of 4
27-09-2017 01:30:03 :::
CRM No.M-9975 of 2017 [3]

any pressure or coercion. The petitioner, who is the sole accused, is not reported

to be a proclaimed offender. Statements of the parties are appended alongwith

the said report.

Learned counsel for respondent No.2 reaffirms and verifies the

factum of settlement between the parties. It is reiterated that in view of the

compromise arrived between the parties, respondent No.2 has no objection to the

quashing of the abovementioned FIR against the petitioner.

Learned counsel for the State submits that as the abovesaid FIR

arises out of a matrimonial dispute, the State has no objection to the quashing of

the FIR in question as well as all consequential proceedings on the basis of a

settlement arrived at between the parties.

In Kulwinder Singh and others versus State of Punjab and

another 2007 (3) R.C.R. (Criminal) 1052, a five member Bench of this Court has

observed as under:-

“The compromise, in a modern society, is the sine qua non of
harmony and orderly behaviour. It is the soul of justice and if the
power under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code is used to
enhance such a compromise which, in turn, enhances the social
amity and reduces friction, then it truly is “finest hour of justice”.

The Hon’ble Supreme Court in B.S.Joshi and others v. State of

Haryana, 2003(4) SCC 675 has observed that it becomes the duty of the Court

to encourage genuine settlements of matrimonial disputes.

Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of this case, it would be

in the interest of justice to quash the abovesaid FIR as no useful purpose would

be served by continuance of the present proceedings. It will merely lead to

wastage of precious time of the court and would be an exercise in futility.

3 of 4
27-09-2017 01:30:03 :::
CRM No.M-9975 of 2017 [4]

This petition is, thus, allowed and FIR No.0014 dated 29.02.2016

under Section 498A IPC registered at Police Station Women, District Amritsar

City alongwith all consequential proceedings are, hereby, quashed.

September 21 , 2017. JUDGE

Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No
Whether reportable: Yes/No

4 of 4
27-09-2017 01:30:03 :::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation