SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Birudev S/O. Dagadu Kale And … vs The State Of Maharashtra And Anr on 3 September, 2018

(Order) (1) Cri. Appln. No. 01648 of 2018


Criminal Application No. 01648 of 2018

District : Latur

1. Birudev s/o. Dagadu Kale,
Aged : 40 years,
Occupation : Service as
Assistant Teacher at
Zilla Parishad Primary
School, Yevati,
Taluka Dist. Osmanabad,
R/o. Chorakhali,
Taluka Kallam,
Dist. Osmanabad, now at
Taluka Dist. Osmanabad.

2. Sow. Rukminbai w/o. Dagadu Kale,
Aged : 75 years,
Occupation : Household,
R/o. Chorakhali,
Taluka Kallam,
Dist. Osmanabad.

3. Dagadu s/o. Dadarao Kale,
Aged : 80 years,
Occupation : Agriculture,
R/o. Chorakhali,
Taluka Kallam,
Dist. Osmanabad.

4. Smt. Sitabai w/o. Machindra
Aged : 55 years,
Occupation : Household,
R/o. Sapnai,
Taluka Kallam,
Dist. Osmanabad.

5. Sow. Chaya w/o. Sarjerao
Aged : 52 years,

::: Uploaded on – 07/09/2018 ::: Downloaded on – 08/09/2018 00:27:11 :::
(Order) (2) Cri. Appln. No. 01648 of 2018

Occupation : Household,
R/o. Mangrul, .. Petitioners
Taluka Kallam, (Original
Dist. Osmanabad. accused)


1. The State of Maharashtra,
Through the Police Station
Police Station, Renapur,
District Latur.

2. Sow. Sangita w/o. Birudev
Aged : 35 years, .. Respondents
Occupation : Household, (No.02 –
R/o. Darji Borgaon, Original
Taluka Renapur, complainant)
Dist. Latur.


Mr. S.S. Choudhary, Advocate, for the applicants.

Mrs. P.V. Diggikar, Additional Public Prosecutor,
for respondent no.01.

Mr. G.J. Kore, Advocate, for respondent no.02.





01. By the present application, the applicants –
original accused are praying for quashing the F.I.R.
bearing No. 79/2013, lodged by respondent no.02, at
Police Station, Renapur, District Latur, on
06.07.2013, for offences punishable under Sections

::: Uploaded on – 07/09/2018 08/09/2018 00:27:11 :::
(Order) (3) Cri. Appln. No. 01648 of 2018

498A, 323, 504, read with Section 34 of the Indian
Penal Code; charge-sheet filed in pursuance thereto,
as well as Regular Criminal Case No. 99 of 2013
pending in the Court of Judicial Magistrate (F.C.),
Renapur, District Latur.

02. Mr. S.S. Choudhary, learned Advocate
appearing for the applicants has raised various
grounds including the ground of legal jurisdiction.
He further submitted that more than 64 adjournments
were sought on complainant’s side and intention
behind it is only to harass the applicants. He
submitted that the applicants are old persons and on
merits also they have good case.

03. On the other hand, learned Advocate
appearing for respondent no.02 submitted that already
four witnesses are examined in the case, including
the first informant.

04. As the case is of 2013 and evidence is
already recorded, it would be appropriate that the
learned Magistrate shall decide the case within a
stipulated period. It is always open to the trial
court to close the case if no interest to adduce
evidence by the prosecution is shown.

05. Hence, the following order :-

::: Uploaded on – 07/09/2018 08/09/2018 00:27:11 :::

(Order) (4) Cri. Appln. No. 01648 of 2018

(a) Learned Judicial Magistrate (First Class),
Renapur, District Latur, shall decide Regular
Criminal Case No. 99 of 2013, between the parties, as
expeditiously as possible and preferably within a
period of one month from today.

(b) The learned Magistrate shall not grant
adjournments to either side unless it is inevitable.

(c) With the above directions, the criminal
application is disposed of.

06. Parties to act on an authenticated copy of
this order.

( Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi ) ( T.V. Nalawade )


puranik / CRIAPPLN1648.18

::: Uploaded on – 07/09/2018 08/09/2018 00:27:11 :::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link
MyNation Times Magzine

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.


Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation