SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Case No. 346 Of 2019) vs In Re: Tithi Mandal & Anr on 8 July, 2019

1

08.07.19

Sl. No.136
akd
[ALLOWED]
C. R. M. 5836 of 2019

In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure filed on 05.07.2019 in connection with Kaliachak Police Station Case No. 61 of
2019 dated 24.01.2019 under Sections 498A/Section304B/Section34 of the Indian Penal Code. (G.R.
Case No. 346 of 2019)
And

In Re: Tithi Mandal Anr.

… … Petitioners

Ms. Minoti Gomes .. Advocate
… … for the petitioners

Mr. Swapan Banerjee .. Advocate
Mr. Suman De .. Advocate
… … for the State

Heard the learned advocate appearing for both the parties.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that petitioner no.1 is the married

sister-in-law of the victim-housewife and petitioner no.2 is her husband. It is further

submitted that they do not reside at the matrimonial home of the victim-housewife.

Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail and

submits that the victim-housewife died due to strangulation within three months of

marriage.

We have considered the materials on record. There is no material to show that

the petitioners were present at the matrimonial home on the fateful day. Keeping in mind

the extent of complicity of the petitioners particularly in the light of the submission that

they do not ordinarily reside in the matrimonial home of the victim-housewife who suffered

death due to strangulation, we are of the opinion that custodial interrogation of the
2

accused/petitioners may not be necessary in the facts of the present case and they may

be granted anticipatory bail.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the accused/petitioners,

namely (1) Tithi Mandal (2) Sujit Mandal be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of

Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) each, with two sureties of like amount each, to

the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down

under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on further condition

that they shall appear before the court below and pray for regular bail within four weeks

from date.

The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, disposed of.

(Manojit Mandal, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation