IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR
TUESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF JULY 2017/20TH ASHADHA, 1939
Crl.MC.No. 4542 of 2017 ()
—————————
CC 986/2016 of J.M.F.C.-II,PERINTHALMANNA
CRIME NO. 317/2016 OF WANDOOR POLICE STATION, MALAPPURAM
PETITIONER(S)/ACCUSED:
———————
1. LINESH,
AGED 31 YEARS,S/O NARAYANAN,KODUVALLLI HOUSE,
PARAKKULAM,THACHANGOTTU,VAANIYAMBALAM.
2. LEELA,
AGED 53 YEARS,W/O.NARAYANAN,KODUVALLLI HOUSE,
PARAKKULAM,THACHANGOTTU,VAANIYAMBALAM.
3. LIJINA,
AGED 26 YEARS,D/O NARAYANAN,KODUVALLLI HOUSE,
PARAKKULAM,THACHANGOTTU,VAANIYAMBALAM.
BY ADV. SRI.P.SAMSUDIN
RESPONDENT(S)/STATE AND DE-FACTO COMPLAINANT:
———————————————
1. STATE OF KERALA,
REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KERALA,ERNAKULAM-682031.
2. GAMAYA,
AGED 21 YEARS,D/O.SREEDHARAN,KLARIYIL HOUSE,
NADUVATH.P.O-679328,WANDOOR,NILAMBUR TALUK,
MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
R2 BY ADV. SMT.ANJU CLETUS
BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT. M.K. PUSHPALATHA
THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 11-07-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED
THE FOLLOWING:
Crl.MC.No. 4542 of 2017 ()
—————————
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)’ EXHIBITS
———————–
ANNEXURE A1 TRUE COPY OF FIR IN CRIME
NO.317/2016 OF WANDOOR POLICE STATION
ANNEXURE A2 TRUE COPY OF FINAL REPORT
IN CRIME NO.317/2016 OF WANDOOR POLICE
STATION
ANNEXURE A3 THE AFFIDAVTI SWORN IN BY
2ND RESPONDENT DATED 25.06.2017.
RESPONDENT(S)’ EXHIBITS
———————–
B. SUDHEENDRA KUMAR, J.
————————————————-
Crl.M.C. No. 4542 of 2017
————————————————-
Dated this the 11th day of July, 2017
ORDER
The petitioners are the accused in C.C. No. 986 of
2016 on the files of the court below. The offences alleged
are offences under Sections 498A and 406 read with
Section 34 IPC.
2. Heard.
3. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for
the parties and the learned Public Prosecutor that the
matter has been settled between the parties. The 2nd
respondent, who is the de facto complainant, filed affidavit
stating that the matter has been settled between the parties
and she has no further grievance against the petitioners.
The above dispute arose out of matrimonial relationship.
Therefore, since the matter has been settled between the
-2-
Crl.M.C. No. 4257 of 2017
parties, I am of the view that quashing the said offences
would secure the ends of justice. For the said reason, I am
inclined to quash Annexure-A2 final report and further
proceedings against the petitioners in C.C. No. 986 of 2016
on the files of the court below, in exercise of the inherent
power under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to meet the ends of
justice and accordingly, I order so.
In the result, this Crl. M.C. Stands allowed.
Sd/- B. SUDHEENDRA KUMAR,
JUDGE.
ani/