SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Code. (G.R. Case No.1859 Of 2019) vs In Re: Rahul Amin @ Ruhul Amin on 2 January, 2020

1

02.01.20

Sl. No.67
akd
[ALLOWED]
C. R. M. 12433 of 2019

In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure filed on 24.12.2019 in connection with Domkal Police Station Case No. 329 of
2019 dated 16.05.2019 under Sections 498A/Section376/Section511/Section325/Section307/Section354/Section34 of the Indian Penal
Code. (G.R. Case No.1859 of 2019)
And

In Re: Rahul Amin @ Ruhul Amin
… … Petitioner
Md. Sabir Ahmmed .. Advocate
Mr. Hillol Saha Podder .. Advocate
… … for the petitioner

Ms. Sonali Bhar .. Advocate
… … for the State

Leave is granted to the learned advocate-on-record for the petitioner to correct

the cause title in the application for anticipatory bail in course of this day.

Heard the learned advocate appearing for both the parties.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has been falsely implicated in

the instant case. It is further submitted that other co-accused persons standing on the

same footing with the petitioner have been granted pre-arrest bail.

Learned advocate appearing for the State produces the case diary and opposes

the prayer for anticipatory bail.

Having considered the materials on record and bearing in mind the nature of

allegations in the light of the aforesaid submissions made on behalf of the petitioner and

as the injuries as appearing from the medical papers do not appear to be grievous, we are

of the opinion that custodial interrogation of the accused/petitioner may not be necessary

in the facts of the present case and he may be granted anticipatory bail.
2

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the accused/petitioner, namely

Rahul Amin @ Ruhul Amin, be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/-

(Rupees Ten thousand only), with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of

the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section

438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on further condition that he shall

appear before the court below and pray for regular bail within four weeks from date.

The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, disposed of.

(Suvra Ghosh, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation