SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Code. (G.R. Case No.2226 Of 2019) vs In Re: Arindam Roy & Ors on 25 November, 2019



Sl. No.64
C. R. M. 10920 of 2019

In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure filed on 21.11.2019 in connection with Alipurduar Women Police Station Case
No. 117 of 2019 dated 01.11.2019 under Sections 498A/Section306/Section506/Section34 of the Indian Penal
Code. (G.R. Case No.2226 of 2019)

In Re: Arindam Roy Ors.

… … Petitioners
Mr. Arnab Saha .. Advocate
… … for the petitioners

Mr. Tanmay Kumar Ghosh .. Advocate
Mrs. Sujata Das .. Advocate
… … for the State

Heard the learned advocate appearing for both the parties.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that they have been falsely implicated

in the instant case.

Learned advocate appearing for the State produces the case diary and opposes

the prayer for anticipatory bail.

We have considered the materials on record. It is a matter to be decided at the

appropriate stage of the proceeding whether the conduct of the petitioners amounts to an

offence under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code. Keeping in mind the nature of

allegations, we are of the opinion that custodial interrogation of the accused/petitioners

may not be necessary in the facts of the present case and they may be granted

anticipatory bail.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the accused/petitioners,

namely (1) Arindam Roy, (2) Sikha Roy, (3) Mithu Mohanta (4) Sombhu Mohanta,

be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only)

each, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and

also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of

Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on further condition that they shall appear before the court

below and pray for regular bail within four weeks from date.

The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, disposed of.

(Suvra Ghosh, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2022 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation