SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Code. (G.R. Case No.3838 Of 2019) vs In Re: Bhaskar Sarkar on 13 November, 2019



Sl. No.76
C. R. M. 10084 of 2019

In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure filed on 22.10.2019 in connection with Baruipur Police Station Case No. 1278
of 2019 dated 14.06.2019 under Sections 498A/Section376/Section323/Section506/Section504/Section34 of the Indian Penal
Code. (G.R. Case No.3838 of 2019)
In Re: Bhaskar Sarkar
… … Petitioner

Mr. Noni Gopal Sarkar .. Advocate
Mr. Devranjan Das .. Advocate
… … for the petitioner

Mr. Prasun Kumar Dutta .. Advocate
Mr. Angshuman Chakraborty .. Advocate
… … for the de-facto complainant

Mr. Pratick Bose .. Advocate
… … for the State

Heard the learned advocate appearing for the respective parties.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is the brother-in-law of the

victim-housewife and has been falsely implicated in the instant case.

Learned advocate appearing for the State produces the case diary and opposes

the prayer for anticipatory bail.

Learned advocate appearing for the de-facto complainant also opposes the

prayer for anticipatory bail and submits that the petitioner had misbehaved with her.

We have considered the materials on record. Allegation with regard to

misbehaviour with the victim-housewife is bereft of material particulars with regard to date

and time. Hence, in the facts and circumstances of the present case, we are of the opinion

though custodial interrogation of the accused/petitioner may not be necessary in the facts

of the present case, his movement requires to be restricted in order to instil confidence in

the minds of the de-facto complainant and other witnesses.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the accused/petitioner, namely

Bhaskar Sarkar, be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten

thousand only), with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting

officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on further condition that he shall not enter the

jurisdiction of Baruipur Police Station until further orders except for the purpose of

investigation and/or for attending court proceedings and shall provide the address where

he shall presently reside to the Investigating Agency as well as the court below and shall

report to the Officer-in-charge of the concerned police station within whose jurisdiction he

shall presently reside once in a week until further orders and shall appear before the court

below and pray for regular bail within four weeks from date.

The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, disposed of.

(Manojit Mandal, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2022 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation