SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Code Read With Sections 3/4 Of The … vs In Re: Govind Jee Ojha @ Govind Ojha on 28 January, 2020



Sl. No.83
C. R. M. 1064 of 2020

In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure filed on 27.01.2020 in connection with Amherst Street Women Police Station
Case No. 05 dated 07.06.2019 under Sections 498A/406/341/324/34 of the Indian Penal
Code read with Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. (G.R. Case No.497 of 2019)

In Re: Govind Jee Ojha @ Govind Ojha
… … Petitioner
Mr. Sourav Chatterjee .. Advocate
Mr. Sauvik Dere .. Advocate
… … for the petitioner

Mr. Sandip Chakraborty .. Advocate
… … for the State

Heard the learned advocate appearing for both the parties.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is the husband of the victim. It is

further submitted that the victim-housewife had been staying at her parental home since


Learned advocate appearing for the State produces the case diary and opposes

the prayer for anticipatory bail.

Having considered the materials on record and bearing in mind the nature of

allegations in the light of the aforesaid submission made on behalf of the petitioner, we

are of the opinion that custodial interrogation of the accused/petitioner may not be

necessary in the facts of the present case and he may be granted anticipatory bail.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the accused/petitioner, namely

Govind Jee Ojha @ Govind Ojha, be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of

Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only), with two sureties of like amount each, to the

satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down

under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on further condition

that he shall meet the Investigating Officer once in a week until further orders and shall

appear before the court below and pray for regular bail within four weeks from date.

The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, disposed of.

(Suvra Ghosh, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Copyright © 2022 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation