IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALEXANDER THOMAS
TUESDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2019 / 23RD ASWINA, 1941
Bail Appl..No.7096 OF 2019
CRIME NO.1071/2019 OF KUNDARA POLICE STATION, KOLLAM
APPLICANT/ACCUSED NOS.2 TO 6:
1 AMBILY.R,
AGED 49 YEARS
D/O D. RAJAN, KALLUVILA VEEDU, THANNIKKODE,
KUNDARA.P.O., KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN-691 501.
2 CYRIL CHACKO,
AGED 52 YEARS
S/O D.CHACKO, KALLUVILA VEEDU, THANNIKKODE,
KUNDARA.P.O., KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN-691 501.
3 AJAYAKUMAR.R,
AGED 50 YEARS
S/O D.RAJAN, KALLUVILA VEEDU, THANNIKKODE,
KUNDARA.P.O., KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN-691 501.
NOW RESIDING AT HARISREE, MALAMKKAVU, ALATHUR P.O,
PALAKKAD, PIN-678 541.
4 D.RAJAN,
AGED 80 YEARS
S/O DANIEL, KALLUVILA VEEDU, THANNIKKODE,
KUNDARA.P.O., KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN-691 501.
5 SUMATHY.K,
AGED 69 YEARS
W/O D.RAJAN, KALLUVILA VEEDU, THANNIKKODE,
KUNDARA.P.O.KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN-691 501.
BY ADVS.
SRI.PRASUN.S
SRI.P.V.SREENIJIN
SRI.N.A.RETHEESH
B.A.No.7096 of 2019
2
RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT-STATE:
STATE OF KERALA,
REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-PIN-682 031,
REPRESENTING THE S.I. OF POLICE,
KUNDARA POLICE STATION.
SRI.P.N.SUMODU, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
15.10.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
B.A.No.7096 of 2019
3
ALEXANDER THOMAS, J.
B.A.No.7096 of 2019
Dated this the 15th day of October, 2019
ORDER
Petitioners herein have been arrayed as accused 2 to 6 among the six
accused in the instant Crime No.1071/2019 of Kundara Police Station,
Kollam, which has been registered for offences punishable under
Secs.294(b), 323, 313, 498A 506 of the Indian Penal Code, on the basis of
the FI Statement given by the lady de facto complainant on 21.05.2019 at
about 10 p.m., in respect of the alleged incident which happened for the
period from 16.01.2012 onwards. The lady de facto complainant herein is
the wife of A-1.
2. The learned Public Prosecutor would submit on the basis of
instructions that the petitioners herein (accused 2 to 6) have already been
deleted from the accused array in the instant crime by the Investigating
Officer and now the originally arrayed accused No.1 is the sole accused in
the present crime and that therefore, the apprehension of the petitioners
that they will be arrested in relation to the investigation in this crime is
B.A.No.7096 of 2019
4
unfounded, as they are no longer accused in this crime. The said
submission on behalf of the prosecution is recorded.
Recording the abovesaid submission made by the prosecution, the
above application will stand disposed of.
Sd/-
ALEXANDER THOMAS
JUDGE
vgd