IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR
WEDNESDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF JULY 2017/14TH ASHADHA, 1939
Crl.MC.No. 4438 of 2017 ()
—————————
CRIME NO. 1253/2011 OF KILIKOLLOOR POLICE STATION , KOLLAM
PETITIONER(S)/ACCUSED NOS.1 TO 3:
————————————————–
1. SHEFEEK
S/O TAJUDEEN, AGED 34 YEARS, IYRATTUVILA VEEDU, COLLEGE
NAGAR, KILIKOLLOOR VILLAGE, KOLLAM.
2. RAFEEK,
S/O TAJUDEEN, AGED 37 YEARS, IYRATTUVILA VEEDU, COLLEGE
NAGAR, KILIKOLLOOR VILLAGE, KOLLAM.
3. NASEEMA,
W/O TAJUDEEN, AGED 55 YEARS, IYRATTUVILA VEEDU, COLLEGE
NAGAR, KILIKOLLOOR VILLAGE, KOLLAM.
BY ADVS.SRI.PRATHEESH.P
SMT.S.SEETHA
RESPONDENT(S)/STATE DEFACTO- COMPLAINANT :
———————————————————————-
1. STATE OF KERALA
THROUGH THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KILIKOLLOOR POLICE
STATION REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF
KERALA, ERNAKULAM 682031.
2. NIJANA,
D/O SHEBANA, AGED 27 YEARS,
NISHA MANZIL, KAIKKARA PURAYIDOM, PALLITHOTTAM, KOLLAM
WEST VILLAGE, KOLLAM 691371.
R2 BY ADV. SRI.A.MUHAMMED RAFFI
R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, SMT. M K PUSHPALATHA
THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05-07-
2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Crl.MC.No. 4438 of 2017 ()
—————————
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)’ EXHIBITS
———————————–
ANNEXURE 1 THE COPY OF FIR IN CRIME NO.1253/2011 OF KILIKOLLOOR POLICE
STATION.
ANNEXURE 2 THE COPY OF FINAL REPORT IN CRIME NO.1253/2011 OF
KILIKOLLOOR POLICE.
ANNEXURE 3 THE AFFIDAVIT SWORN BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT REGARDING
THE COMPROMISE DATED 17.6.2017.
RESPONDENT(S)’ EXHIBITS : NIL
———————–
// True Copy //
PA to Judge
B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR, J.
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – — – – — – – – – – – – – – — – – – – – – – –
Crl.M.C. No.4438 of 2017
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
Dated this the 5th day of July 2017
O R D E R
The petitioners are the accused in C.C.No.825 of 2012
on the files of the court below. The offence alleged is the
offence under Section 498A read with section 34 I.P.C.
2. Heard.
3. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the
parties and the learned Public Prosecutor that the matter
has been settled between the parties. The second
respondent, who is the de-facto complainant in this case,
filed affidavit stating that the matter has been settled
between the parties and hence, she has no further grievance
against the petitioners. Since the matter has been settled between
the parties, quashing the said offence would secure the ends of
justice. For the said reason, I am inclined to quash Annexure-
2 final report and further proceedings against the petitioners
in C.C. No.825 of 2012 on the files of the court below, in
Crl.M.C.4438/2017
-: 2 :-
exercise of the inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C.,
to meet the ends of justice and accordingly, I order so.
In the result, this Crl.M.C. stands allowed.
Sd/-
B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR,
JUDGE
dl/5.7.2017