SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

CRMPM/216/2020 on 6 February, 2020

Cr.MP No. 337 of 2020 in Cr.MP(M) No. 216 of 2020

06.02.2020 Present: Mr. Bimal Gupta, Sr. Advocate, with

.

Ms. Kusum Chaudhary, Advocate, for the

applicant/petitioner.

Mr. Hemant Vaid, Addl. AG, with Mr.
Narender Thakur, Dy. AG and Mr. Manoj Bagga,

Asstt. AG, for the non­
applicant/respondent/State.

The present application has been maintained by the

applicant/petitioner under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for correction of

typographical errors in order dated 05.02.2020, passed by this

Court in Cr.MP(M) No. 216 of 2020.

A perusal of order dated 05.02.2020 shows that FIR

No. is same, but inadvertently district of police station has been

wrongly mentioned as Kullu instead of Mandi and Section 354

IPC has not been mentioned.

In view of the above, order dated 05.02.2020,

passed by this Court in Cr.MP(M) No. 216 of 2020 is modified

and last para of the same be read as under:

“At this stage, after hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner,
learned Additional Advocate General for the respondent/State,
going through the records and keeping in view the facts and
circumstances of the case, it is ordered that the petitioner be
enlarged on bail, till the next date of hearing, in case FIR No. 28
of 2020, under Section 3(1)(f), (s), (w) (i) of Scheduled caste and
Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, and Section
354 IPC, registered at Police Station Aut, Mandi, H.P., on his
furnishing personal bond to the tune of Rs, 20,000/­ (rupees
twenty thousand only) with one surety in the like amount to the
satisfaction of the Registrar/Additional Registrar (Judicial),
subject the following conditions:

1. That the petitioner will join investigation of the
case as and when called for by the Investigating
Officer in accordance with law;

06/02/2020 20:26:14 :::HCHP

2. That the petitioner will not leave India without
prior permission of the Court;
…2…

.

3. That the petitioner will not directly or indirectly
make any inducement, threat or promise to any
person acquainted with the facts of the case so

as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such
facts to the Investigating Officer or Court.”

The application stands disposed of.

Copy dasti.

(Chander Bhusan Barowalia)
r Vacation Judge
February 06, 2020

(virender)

06/02/2020 20:26:14 :::HCHP

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation