SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Dal Chand And Another vs State Of Haryana on 16 August, 2017


Criminal Misc. M- No. 13763 of 2017 (OM)
Date of decision : August 16, 2017

Dal Chand and another …..Petitioners


State of Haryana ….Respondent


Present: Mr. Ram Bilas Gupta, Advocate
for the petitioners.

Mr. Sanjay K. Saini, AAG, Haryana.


Prayer in this petition is for grant of anticipatory bail to the

petitioners in FIR No. 556 dated 25.09.2016 registered under Sections

498A, 506, 323, 494 IPC at Police Station SGM Nagar, District Faridabad.

This petition was dismissed as having been rendered

infructuous qua petitioner No. 1 on 05.05.2017.

Petitioner No. 2 is the mother-in-law of the complainant. It is

submitted that general and vague allegations have been levelled against

petitioner No. 2, who is an old illiterate lady. The complainant i.e. the

daughter-in-law of petitioner No. 2 was married to the petitioners’ son 11

years prior to registration of the FIR. It is submitted that the petitioner and

her husband are living separately from the complainant (daughter-in-law)

and their son. The petitioner’s son was living with the complainant in her

parents house (Ghar Jamai). Thus, allegations against the petitioner are

clearly misconceived. Moreover, petitioner No. 2 has joined investigation

pursuant to interim order dated 05.05.2017. She is not involved in any other

criminal case. It is, thus, prayed that this petition be allowed.

1 of 2
19-08-2017 14:16:17 :::
Criminal Misc. M- No. 13763 of 2017 (OM) -2-

Learned counsel for the State, ASI Wali Mohammad, verifies

that petitioner No. 2 has joined investigation and her custodial interrogation,

it is submitted, is not required.

There are no allegations on behalf of the State that the

petitioner is likely to abscond or that she is likely to dissuade the

witnesses from deposing true facts in the Court, if released on bail. It is

verified that the petitioner is not involved in any other criminal case.

Keeping in view the facts and circumstances noted above but

without expressing any opinion on the merits of case, it is considered just

and expedient to allow this petition. Consequently, order dated 05.05.2017

is made absolute.

(Lisa Gill)
August 16, 2017 Judge
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No

Whether reportable : Yes/No

2 of 2
19-08-2017 14:16:18 :::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation