T.A. No. 631 of 2018 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
T.A. No. 631 of 2018
DATE OF DECISION :- March 18, 2019
Damanpreet Kaur …Applicant
Versus
Ramanpreet Singh …Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. MADAAN
Present:- Mr. Parvez Chugh, Advocate for the applicant.
Mr. Ramanjeet Singh, Advocate for the respondent.
***
By way of filing the present application, applicant Damanpreet
Kaur, aged about 33 years, wife of Ramanpreet Singh-respondent presently
residing with her parents at Ferozepur, seeks transfer of petition under
Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 filed by her husband
Ramanpreet Singh against her having title ‘Ramanpreet Singh Vs.
Damanpreet Kaur’ pending in the Court of Additional District Judge,
Ludhiana to the Court of competent jurisdiction at Ferozepur.
According to the applicant, the marriage between the parties
was performed on 10.3.2016. Thereafter they started residing together as
husband and wife. The applicant gave birth to a daughter from loins of
respondent on 15.5.2017, however, differences arose between the spouses
and applicant was forced to leave the matrimonial home. She had no other
1 of 4
24-03-2019 10:49:14 :::
T.A. No. 631 of 2018 2
place to go except house of her parents at Ferozepur where she is putting up
along with minor daughter of the parties. The applicant has lodged an F.I.R.
against the respondent for offences under Sections 406 and 498A IPC with
Police Station women, District Ferozepur besides filing of petition under
Section 125 Cr.P.C. against the respondent seeking maintenance. She being
a young woman, taking care of minor daughter of the parties aged about one
year, having no source of income, it is difficult for her to travel from
Ferozepur to Ludhiana covering a distance of about 130 kms on one side so
as to attend the dates of hearing there, as such the application be accepted.
Notice of the application was given to the respondent, who has
put in appearance through his counsel and filed written reply opposing the
application contending that the applicant is a practicing Advocate at
Ferozepur. Her brother is also in active practice in District Court Ferozepur
and if divorce petition in question is transferred to the Court at Ferozepur,
then respondent would be severally prejudiced, therefore, the application be
dismissed.
I have heard learned counsel for the parties besides going
through the record.
The major ground for opposition of transfer is that applicant
and her brother are practicing Advocates at Ferozepur. May it be so but they
cannot possibly interfere in judicial proceedings and influence the result
thereof. The comparative inconvenience to applicant shall be much more if
application is rejected then it is allowed.
The Apex Court in various judgments has observed that in
matrimonial disputes between the spouses convenience of wife should be
2 of 4
24-03-2019 10:49:14 :::
T.A. No. 631 of 2018 3
looked into. In that regard a reference can be made to authority Sumita
Singh Versus Kumar Sanjay and another, 2002 AIR(SC) 396 by a
Division Bench of Hon’ble Supreme Court.
In Bhartiben Ravibhai Rav Versus Ravibhai Govindbhai Rav,
2017(3) RCR(Civil) 369, the Apex Court had allowed application for
transfer of the divorce petition to a place where the wife was residing
considering various factors including the distance between the place where
the wife was residing and the place of sitting of the Court where divorce
petition had been instituted and the fact that the wife had filed two cases
against her husband in the Court at the place of her residence wherein the
respondent had already put in appearance.
In Apurva Versus Navtej Singh, 2017(2) Law Herald 966 by a
Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, it was observed that wherever the Courts
are called upon to consider the plea of transfer in matrimonial disputes, the
Courts have to take into consideration various factors like economic
soundness of either of the parties, the social strata of the spouses to which
they belong and behavioural pattern, standard of life antecedents of
marriage. Generally it is the wife’s convenience, which must be looked at by
the Courts while deciding the transfer application.
Keeping in view the contentions in the application and
submissions made by learned counsel for the applicant, in which I find
merit, in absence of any strong circumstance to the contrary, it would be
proper and appropriate if the application is accepted. The same is
accordingly allowed. The petition in question is ordered to be withdrawn
from the Court of District Judge, Ludhiana and transferred to the Court of
3 of 4
24-03-2019 10:49:14 :::
T.A. No. 631 of 2018 4
District Judge, Ferozepur for disposal in accordance with law. Learned
District Judge, Ferozepur may retain the petition on his board or assign it to
any other Court of competent jurisdiction.
The parties through their counsel are directed to appear in the
transferee Court on 29.4.2019. Copies of orders be sent to the Court of
District Judge, Ludhiana as well as to the Court of District Judge, Ferozepur
for information and necessary compliance.
(H.S. MADAAN)
JUDGE
March 18, 2019
p.singh
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Whether Reportable Yes/No
4 of 4
24-03-2019 10:49:14 :::