SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Damodar Karnani & Ors vs State & Anr on 18 September, 2017

+ W.P.(CRL) 2255/2017 Crl.M.A. 12759/2017
Through: Ms.Priyanka Sharma, Advocate
along with petitioners in person.

STATE ANR ….. Respondents
Through: Ms. Kamna Vohra, learned ASC
for the State with S.I. Anil Kumar, Police
Station C.R. Park, Delhi.
Respondent No.2 in person.

% 18.09.2017

1. Respondent no. 2 appears in person. She is duly identified by IO
SI Anil Kumar.

2. The petitioners have invoked the writ jurisdiction of this court
under Article 22/227 of the Constitution of India read with Section
482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short ‘Cr.P.C.’) for
quashing of the FIR bearing No.99/2015, registered against them on
07.03.2015 with Police Station C.R. Park, South East District, Delhi
under Sections 498A/406 IPC on the complaint of respondent No.2.

3. The marriage of the petitioner No.1 with the respondent no. 2
was solemnized on 02.12.2007 as per Hindu rites and ceremonies in
Delhi. However, out of this wedlock no child was born.

4. After solemnization of marriage, the couple started living at the
matrimonial home. Due to some temperamental differences between
W.P. (Crl.) 2255/2017 Page 1 of 3
the petitioner No.1 and the respondent no.2, they could not reconcile
with each other. Resultantly, the respondent no.2 left the matrimonial
home on 08.09.2013 and started living with her mother in Delhi.

5. She lodged a complaint with CAW Cell which culminated into
the said FIR against the petitioners.

6. The petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 submit that they, with
the intention to settle the matter amicably, appeared before Delhi
Govt. Mediation Conciliation Centre (A Centre set up by Govt. of
NCT of Delhi). They had resolved and settled all their disputes before
the learned Mediator on 4th March, 2016.

7. By this settlement, the petitioner no. 1 and the respondent no. 2
had decided to part company of each other and obtain a decree of
divorce by mutual consent. The petitioner no. 1 had agreed to pay a
total sum of Rs.13,00,000/- to the respondent no. 2 in full and final
settlement of her all claims including the maintenance and cost of
dowry/stridhan articles.

8. The petitioner no.1 and respondent No.2 submit that they had
voluntarily resolved all disputes amicably without any coercion or

9. Pursuant to this settlement, Rs.3,25,000/- was paid by the
petitioner no.1 to the respondent no.2 at the time of recording the
statement of the parties in the first motion petition. A sum of
Rs.3,25,000/- was transferred by the petitioner No.1 to the respondent
No.2 on 20th May, 2016 by RTGS in her account directly. A sum of
Rs.3,25,000/- was paid by the petitioner No.1 to the respondent No.2
at the time of recording their statement in the second motion petition.

W.P. (Crl.) 2255/2017 Page 2 of 3

A decree of divorce by mutual consent was granted on 19.07.2017 by
the court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, South East
District, Saket Courts, New Delhi, by which the marriage between the
petitioner no. 1 and the respondent no.2 was dissolved.

10. Today, the petitioner No.1 has paid the balance settlement
amount of Rs.3,25,000/- vide DD No.816325 dated 09.02.2017
revalidated on 04.08.2017 issued by Punjab National Bank, in favour
of respondent No.2, which has been accepted by her. She submits that
she has received the entire settlement amount from the petitioner No.1.
She submits that she does not want to pursue the said FIR. She
submits that the said FIR may be quashed.

11. Learned ASC through IO submits that the charge sheet has so
far not been filed.

12. Both the parties submit that now nothing is due and recoverable
by them against each other. Since the parties have amicably settled all
their disputes, no fruitful purpose would be served in further pursuing
the said FIR. Hence, to secure ends of justice, the FIR bearing No.99
/2015, registered against them on 07.03.2015 with Police Station C.R.
Park, South East District, Delhi under Sections 498A/406 IPC and
proceedings arising out of the said FIR are hereby quashed.

13. The petition is disposed of accordingly.

14. Crl.M.A. 12759/2017 stands disposed of. DASTI.


SEPTEMBER 18, 2017/jitender

W.P. (Crl.) 2255/2017 Page 3 of 3

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.


Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation