SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Darshan Kaur vs State Of Punjab on 26 February, 2018


Criminal Misc. No. M- 20174 of 2016 (OM)
Date of decision : February 26, 2018

Darshan Kaur …..Petitioner

State of Punjab and another ….Respondents


Present: Mr. Parminder Singh-I, Advocate
for the petitioner.

Ms. Monika Jalota, DAG, Punjab.

Mr. Rajiv Joshi, Advocate
for respondent No. 2.

Prayer in this petition is for grant of anticipatory bail to the

petitioner in FIR No. 81 dated 18.12.2015 under Sections 406, 498A,

420, 323, 120B IPC registered at Police Station City Banga, District

Shaheed Bhagat Singh Nagar.

It is informed by learned counsel for the petitioner and

respondent No. 2 that during the pendency of this petition, the matter

has been amicably resolved between the parties before the Mediation

and Conciliation Centre of this Court on 15.11.2017. Settlement/

agreement dated 15.11.2017 is attached with this file. It is informed

that petitioner and respondent No. 2 have decided to part ways. Part of

the settled amount (`6 lakhs) has since been handed over to respondent

No. 2. The petitioner as well as her son (husband of the complainant)

undertake to abide by the terms and conditions of the settlement. It is,

thus, prayed that this petition be allowed.

1 of 2
04-03-2018 02:39:44 :::
Criminal Misc. No. M- 20174 of 2016 (OM) -2-

Learned counsel for respondent No. 2 submits that his

client has no objection, in case, this petition is allowed subject to strict

adherence to the terms and conditions of the settlement.

Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from ASI

Lakhbir Singh, verifies that the petitioner has joined investigation.

There are no allegations on behalf of the State that the

petitioner is likely to abscond or that she is likely to dissuade the

witnesses from deposing true facts in the Court, if released on bail.

Keeping in view the facts and circumstances noted above

but without expressing any opinion on the merits of case, it is

considered just and expedient to allow this petition. Consequently,

order dated 03.06.2016 is made absolute.

(Lisa Gill)
February 26, 2018 Judge
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No

Whether reportable : Yes/No

2 of 2
04-03-2018 02:39:46 :::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link
MyNation Times Magzine

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.


Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation