SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Davinder Singh @ Tony And Anr vs State Of Punjab And Anr on 31 May, 2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M No.43693 of 2018
Date of decision: 31st May, 2019

Davinder Singh @ Tony another
… Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab another
… Respondents

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE FATEH DEEP SINGH

Present: Ms. Richudeep Bajaj, Advocate for
Mr. Ankit Rana, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Rakeshinder S. Sidhu, Asstt. AG, Punjab
for respondent No.1/State.
None for respondent No.2.

FATEH DEEP SINGH, J. (ORAL)

Report dated 17.11.2018 of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st

Class, Ludhiana has been received whereby after recording statements of

complainant Sarabjit Kaur and the accused persons, namely Davinder

Singh alias Tony and Amritpal Kaur, the Court has shown its satisfaction

that the compromise has been arrived at voluntarily, out of free will of

the parties, without any undue influence, coercion or pressure.

Learned counsel representing the accused/petitioners has

made statement that as per instructions received, the parties had given

final effect to their agreement settlement/compromise (Annexure P2) and

that nothing is due towards anyone on account of this settlement and that

the final effect be given to this petition.

Heard.

1 of 2
23-06-2019 19:26:19 :::
CRM-M No.43693 of 2018 2

In the light of the satisfaction shown by the Court and the fact

that the dispute between the parties being a pure matrimonial and the

offenses for which the accused have been hauled up are not of serious

nature, together with the fact that compromise will go a long way in

ironing out differences for betterment of future life of the parties and in

view of the law laid down in ‘SectionGian Singh v. State of Punjab and

another’ 2012(4) RCR (Criminal) 543 and ‘SectionKulwinder Singh and

others v. State of Punjab and another’ 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal)

1052, the prayer made in the petition is allowed, proceedings by way of

FIR No.22 dated 11.03.2017 under Sections 498A, Section406 IPC pertaining to

Police Station Women Cell, Ludhiana and all consequences arising out of

the said FIR in respect of the petitioners are quashed.

The petition stands disposed off in those terms.

(FATEH DEEP SINGH)
JUDGE
May 31, 2019
rps
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Whether reportable Yes/No

2 of 2
23-06-2019 19:26:19 :::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2020 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation