SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Deepak Rajendrasinh … vs State Of Gujarat & on 1 December, 2017

R/CR.MA/17532/2017 ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR QUASHING SET ASIDE
FIR/ORDER) NO. 17532 of 2017

DEEPAK RAJENDRASINH RATHOD(RATHOR) 2….Applicant(s)
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT 1….Respondent(s)

Appearance:
MR SJ MAKWANA, ADVOCATE for the Applicant(s) No. 1 – 3
MR.DIPAK B PATEL, ADVOCATE for the Applicant(s) No. 1 – 3
HCLS COMMITTEE, ADVOCATE for the Respondent(s) No. 2
MS KHUSHBU P VYAS, ADVOCATE for the Respondent(s) No. 2
MS MOXA THAKKAR, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA

Date : 01/12/2017

ORAL ORDER

1 By   this   application   under   Section   482   of   the   Code   of   Criminal 
Procedure, 1973,  the  applicants  ­  original  accused seek  to invoke  the 
inherent   powers   of   this   Court,   praying   for   quashing   of   the   First 
Information Report bearing C.R. No.I­145 of 2017  registered with the 
Krishnanagar   Police   Station,   Ahmedabad   for  the   offence   punishable 
under Sections 498A, 323 and 294(B) read with 114 of the Indian Penal 
Code.

2  Today,   when   the   matter   is   taken   up   for   hearing,   it   is   jointly 
submitted by the learned advocates appearing for the respective parties 
that the dispute has been amicably resolved between the parties and the 

Page 1 of 3

HC-NIC Page 1 of 3 Created On Fri Dec 01 23:53:26 IST 2017
R/CR.MA/17532/2017 ORDER

respondent   No.2   has   no   objection   if   the   First   Information   Report   is 
quashed. The respondent no.2 viz. Taraben is personally present in the 
Court and she is being identified by her learned advocate Ms. Vyas,  She 
has filed an affidavit dated 1st December 2017 inter alia stating as under:

“I, Taraben w/o Deepak Rajendrasinh Rathod (Rathor), Religion: Hindu,  
Age: 38 years, Resided at: G­504,  Madhuvan  Glory, Shree Ram Chauk,  
Nava Naroda, Ahmedabad Gender, Female, the respondent No.2 (Original  
complainant) herein do hereby state on oath as under:

1 That I am the original complainant of the complaint registered at  
C.R. No.I­145 of 2017 registered with Krushna Nagar Station Ahmedabad  
for the offences punishable under Section, 498(A), 323, 294(B) and 114  
of the Indian Penal Code. 

2 That   due   to   the   intervention   of   the   respectable   persons   of   the  
Society   and   family   members,   there   has   been   a   compromise   take   place  
between   the   husband   and   me.   I   say   that   in   view   of   the   compromise  
between   the   parties,   I   don’t   have   any   grievance   against   the   present  
applicant – original accused. 

3 I state that we have amicably settled the dispute and had decided to  
have peaceful and amicable relations and good atmosphere in our home. I  
also filed the F.I.R. being C.R. I­10 of 2017 filed before the Mahila Police  
Station (East) Dist. Ahmedabad which is also quashed by the order dated  
21­11­17 passed by this Honourable High Court in Cr.M.A. No.28306 of  
2017.

4 I therefore say and submit that the complaint filed by me against  
the present applicant – original accused is liable to be quashed. I do not  
have any objection for the same for quashing the FIR. 

Page 2 of 3

HC-NIC Page 2 of 3 Created On Fri Dec 01 23:53:26 IST 2017
R/CR.MA/17532/2017 ORDER

Solemnly affirmed on this 1st December, 2017 at Ahmedabad.”

3 Taking into consideration  the  fact that  the dispute  between the 
parties   has   been   amicably   settled,   no   useful   purpose   would   now   be 
served to continue with the investigation. The affidavit is ordered to be 
taken on record.

4 In   the   result,   this   application   is   allowed.   The   First   Information 
Report  being  C.R.   No.I­145   of   2017  registered   with   the   Krishnanagar 
Police   Station,   Ahmedabad  is   quashed.   Consequently,   all   further 
proceedings pursuant thereto stand terminated. Rule is made absolute. 
Direct service is permitted.

(J.B.PARDIWALA, J.)
chandresh

Page 3 of 3

HC-NIC Page 3 of 3 Created On Fri Dec 01 23:53:26 IST 2017

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link
MyNation Times Magzine


All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

Recent Comments

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2024 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation